Compliment sandwich:
I've really, really, really enjoyed the last few issues. JG's article on the 'ring was some of the best race-reporting I've ever read.
On the other hand, (insert copy from another thread) the "Hottest Hatch?" article made zero sense to me, from the standpoint that they were three completely different cars, and I couldn't figure out exactly how the 'best' car was determined. Wouldn't a Honda Fit be a better more appropriate car to put head-to-head against the Mazda2? Do I just need to be beaten over the head with the "CR-Z'S ARE COOL DAMNIT!" hammer more often? Isn't the Mazda2 the best value over the bunch, being WAY cheaper, WAY lighter, handling well enough for 2nd(?) fastest lap, and getting killer gas mileage to boot?
I understand the cars are all supposed to be classed in H-stock. If it was strictly a "Here's the new hot car for H-stock" article, it would've made sense.
How did the mini end up being the 'winner?' Strictly based on fastest lap time?
My $.02.

