Login Register Sign up for the GRM e-newsletter

Login to post Forums » Grassroots Motorsports » 2011 Ford Fiesta test drive « 1 2 »
  • GTwannaB

    Aug. 2, 2010 1:47 p.m. GTwannaB Reader

    I just reserved my Fiesta rental car for my trip to Ireland. Assuming I can shift with my left hand and drive on the wrong side of the road, I will have some hands on feedback after next week.

  • integraguy

    Aug. 2, 2010 5:48 p.m. integraguy Dork

    Which model of the Fiesta did you reserve? The top of the engine range in Europe, is what we get here. If you can believe CAR magazine, the Fiesta with the next smaller engine (1.2 or 1.3, I think) is considered to be the better driver. And for most folks that actually buy their cars in Europe, instead of having a company car provided/subsidized for them, the diesel is the way to go.

  • RexSeven

    Aug. 2, 2010 6:06 p.m. RexSeven Dork

    integraguy wrote:

    Good luck on finding that leather-manual transmission combo in a hatch...anytime soon.

    There's a dealership near my work that has TWO manual hatches and I think one of them has leather. Hmm... I wonder if I should arrange a test-drive, even though I have no intention of replacing my MS3 for a while...

  • GTwannaB

    Aug. 3, 2010 1:04 p.m. GTwannaB Reader

    In reply to integraguy:

    Hertz does not give a lot of details on the car. I think it is possible they could switch it on my as well. I am betting it will not be a 1.6L since the Golf/Rabbit they rent has a 1.4L.

  • integraguy

    Aug. 3, 2010 3:20 p.m. integraguy Dork

    GTwannaB,

    i only brought up the issue of the engine size as a reminder that the Euro Fiesta is SLIGHTLY different than the U.S. Fiesta. Not an apples to oranges comparo, but more like an oranges to tangerines comparo.

  • wcelliot

    Aug. 4, 2010 12:40 p.m. wcelliot Reader

    I rented the previous generation Euro Fiesta from Hertz in Italy a couple of years ago... even with the small petrol engine it was the best small car I've ever driven. And the newer generation is supposed to be a whole magnitude better... but I haven't seen anything but auto sedans here to test...

  • Vigo

    Aug. 4, 2010 4:37 p.m. Vigo HalfDork

    Unless i actually PLANNED to overheat my brakes (i.e. race the car on a road-course), i would be perfectly happy with drums in the back. Sure, they're uglier behind nice wheels, and they're stigmatized by armchair mechanics, but in reality they do the same job, last longer and give you less E36 M3 then discs, UNLESS you plan to overheat your brakes. Then get discs. They take to it better!

    If i bought a new Fiesta, i wouldnt be planning on road-coursing it often enough that id care whether it had discs or drums in the back.

  • NOHOME

    Aug. 4, 2010 5:39 p.m. NOHOME Reader

    GTwannaB:

    Did not know that rear disc are not an option. That is GREAT!!!!!!!!!! Rear disc just suck $$$ out of your wallet over the life of the car and really don't do a thing for stopping distances. It's not like the rear brakes are overtaxed on most cars.

    Wife unit is on the fence for a Mazda 2 or 3. This tilts the scales to the 2 side.

« 1 2 »  
Tire Rack- Revolutionizing Tire Buying

You'll need to log in to post.