Login Register Sign up for the GRM e-newsletter

Login to post Forums » Grassroots Motorsports » Any reason this is a bad idea
  • 93EXCivic

    July 28, 2011 11:34 p.m. 93EXCivic SuperDork

    Ok so I was thinking of using motorbike shocks on the Spitfire but the rear has the leaf spring. Is there any reason I can't remove the coil spring and just run the shock on the rear?

  • July 28, 2011 11:45 p.m. triumph5 SuperDork

    Structural integrity of the upper mount. It would become a now now-overloaded upper shock mount.

  • erohslc

    July 29, 2011 12:18 a.m. erohslc Reader

    The Spitfire upper mount is plenty strong enough (hint: transient shock loads far exceed spring loads) Lots of folks have gone to coilovers. ISTR that the Abomination used MC coilovers, and there have been a couple of threads on MC coilovers too.

    Carter

  • bravenrace

    July 29, 2011 5:58 a.m. bravenrace SuperDork

    But aren't you asking about removing the spring on the shock and just using it as a shock along with the leaf spring? That wouldn't be a coil over and I can't see how it could possibly make the shock mount loading any different, except for a change in the stiffness of the shock itself. Or am I misunderstanding the question?

  • mad_machine

    July 29, 2011 6:42 a.m. mad_machine SuperDork

    isn't the transverse leaf spring on the spit MORE than just a spring? I thought it was also a locating member of the suspension

  • pres589

    July 29, 2011 6:49 a.m. pres589 Dork

    Yeah I thought the transverse spring was also an upper locating link on that car.

  • foxtrapper

    July 29, 2011 6:51 a.m. foxtrapper SuperDork

    Yes, you can run just the shock.

  • 93EXCivic

    July 29, 2011 7:16 a.m. 93EXCivic SuperDork

    bravenrace wrote:

    But aren't you asking about removing the spring on the shock and just using it as a shock along with the leaf spring? That wouldn't be a coil over and I can't see how it could possibly make the shock mount loading any different, except for a change in the stiffness of the shock itself.

    Yup that is what I am asking. I am just getting an idiot check to make sure MC shocks don't have anything weird going on.

  • GregW

    July 29, 2011 10:44 a.m. GregW New Reader

    The motorbike shock is probably too soft to damp the much higher spring rate and greater mass of the spitfire hub and wheel adaquately. I would find a set of adjustable Koni NOS shocks and go from there.

  • Teh E36 M3

    July 29, 2011 1:24 p.m. Teh E36 M3 HalfDork

    The YZF-R1 shocks have to control a ~500lb/in spring. That should be plenty stiff, right?

  • triumphcorvair

    July 29, 2011 2:48 p.m. triumphcorvair New Reader

    Just to make sure and reconfirm I'm right, I checked the rear suspension on my 67 MkIII and it doesn't have a "coil over spring" on the shock. PRI makes a rear suspension kit that does away with the transverse leap spring and adds coil overs.

 
Tire Rack- Revolutionizing Tire Buying

You'll need to log in to post.