Login Register Sign up for the GRM e-newsletter

Login to post Forums » Grassroots Motorsports » Are these worth saving?
  • Mazdax605

    Aug. 6, 2010 6:52 p.m. Mazdax605 HalfDork

    Hey guys,

    My wife's aunt has two car that used to belong to he husband. He passed away about a year ago,and I always had said I wanted one of the cars. I was contacted by her,and she wants to know if I am still interested. One of the cars(the one I wanted) is an 88,or 89(12/88 build date) Dodge Caravan 2.2 litre 5-speed. I went to see it today,and while rough around the edges it isn't all rotted,and rusted. I was thinking turbo swap,and challenge vehicle,but I don't know a thing about original Dodge minivans. I was surprised to see leaf springs in the rear. I always assumed they had coil springs.

    The other car is a 99 Saab 93 automatic hatchback. It has collision damage on the front,but doesn't look terrible. It appears very repairable,but if nothing else the turbo engine may be worth getting. Does this car have any desirable parts,or is it worth fixing the collision damage,and then drive,or sell? Is this a GM Saab,or is it before they came on board?

  • 1988RedT2

    Aug. 6, 2010 7:01 p.m. 1988RedT2 Reader

    Only thing I remember about a certain early 2.2 Caravan is that it was dog slow. That, and when the ignition module went bad, it would intermittently stop running. I recall running down a particular stretch of busy road and having the thing let loose with an atomic backfire that genuinely startled a woman pulling alongside of me. I think she may have peed her pants. Ah, good times.

    The muffler never was the same after that.

  • neon4891

    Aug. 6, 2010 7:05 p.m. neon4891 SuperDork

    Do it on the van. Not sure about the saab.

  • Junkyard_Dog

    Aug. 6, 2010 7:07 p.m. Junkyard_Dog HalfDork

    Yes on the van, only because of what you want to do with it. Stock its pretty crappy.

    Not so much on the Saab. Post GM sludging (?) automatic turd.

    Then again you're talking to a guy washing his 3 Volvos worth a combined $2500*, so what do I know?

    *including the soap and water I've used tonight

  • jamscal

    Aug. 6, 2010 7:27 p.m. jamscal Dork

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=haPCQKOyMTo

  • patgizz

    Aug. 6, 2010 7:36 p.m. patgizz SuperDork

    i bought one of those first gen caravans (89) yesterday. tons of room to work under the hood since it actually has a hood and doesnt hide the engine under a giant windshield.

  • Mazdax605

    Aug. 6, 2010 7:56 p.m. Mazdax605 HalfDork

    I was amazed at the space under the hood. With the small 4 banger,no AC,and a tiny radiator it looked like you could climb in there to work on it.

    Can anyone tell me what year the van is with a 12/88 build date?

  • Datsun1500

    Aug. 6, 2010 8:14 p.m. Datsun1500 Dork

    anything after 10/88 is an 89

  • mad_machine

    Aug. 7, 2010 6:04 a.m. mad_machine SuperDork

    the saab could be nice as a daily.. and some of the turbos can go pretty damn quick.. but yes, beware of sludging on the t7 cars and the auto kills all fun

  • minimac

    Aug. 7, 2010 8:22 a.m. minimac SuperDork

    When the mini-kids were little, before jumping into the minivans with both feet, we had an early Voyager, '85, 2.2, 5-speed. I drove that thing all over the country and the 5-speed made it an acceptable driver. It grew on me and I was actually sad when it finally died. The utility was amazing. The only real downer was that the seats were bears to take in and out(and store). I used it as a truck, a camper, as well as a people (and kids)mover. I liked the smaller size and the boxy looks. Forget the turbo swap, clean it up and run the wheels off of it. Tinted windows, a set of wheels and your stylin'! ps- if it's for sale, let me know.

  • Vigo

    Aug. 7, 2010 6:39 p.m. Vigo HalfDork

    Only thing I remember about a certain early 2.2 Caravan is that it was dog slow. That, and when the ignition module went bad, it would intermittently stop running.

    You're talking about a carbed, earlier model. The 88 and 89 vans would have throttle body injection which is practically the most reliable thing ever.

    Plus, i highly doubt it is a 2.2. It is probably a 2.5L. Does it say 2.2 on the emission sticker?

    I have a 90 2.5/5spd caravan that started out tbi and has since been turbocharged. The utility of the vehicle is just freaking amazing. Minimac covered that pretty well. The only thing i would add is that if you leave it non-turbo, it will be the fuel efficient minivan you're likely to find in the united states. My 2.5L averaged 27mpg while not being particularly nice to it. I did go super-easy on it for 200 miles once to see how high it would go. I got 33mpg on that tank.

    A 2.2 non turbo would definitely be slow. The 2.5 is also slow, but generally its pretty satisfying because it makes a lot of torque and its available right off idle. I could get into 5th gear by 25 mph and still accelerate. You could lug the motor down really low and it still felt fine. My stock 2.5/5spd van ran 18.2@73mph several times. Definitely slow, but 0-50 or so was pretty similar to a 17.0 car ( i raced a few) so it doesnt drive as bad as it sounds.

    Of course, when you get the urge there is always the turbo option. The torque of a turbo 2.5 is just ridiculous. The torque of a turbo 2.2, however, is less satisfying.

    So, im hoping its a 2.5, and im recommending you definitely grab it! My 5spd van is my most-loved vehicle!

  • Mazdax605

    Aug. 7, 2010 7:22 p.m. Mazdax605 HalfDork

    Vigo thanks for the info. The van has a 2.2 litre with a factory carb that said Holley on it. At least it looked like a carb,but it definitely said Holley on it. Maybe it is an 88 model,and before the carbs came out,or the door was off a newer van,and had the corresponding tag that showed 12/88 on it. My wife's aunt thought it was an 86,but the door tag said otherwise.

    Chris

  • Gearheadotaku

    Aug. 7, 2010 7:39 p.m. Gearheadotaku Dork

    holley made TBI units too. Pull up the air cleaner to see for sure. 88 and newer should be injected.

  • White_and_Nerdy

    Aug. 7, 2010 8:56 p.m. White_and_Nerdy Reader

    Ditch the 2.2, ditch the interior, and put a V8 or bigger engine in the back, powering the rear wheels.

  • Fit_Is_Slo

    Aug. 7, 2010 10:29 p.m. Fit_Is_Slo Reader

    Gearheadotaku wrote:

    holley made TBI units too. Pull up the air cleaner to see for sure. 88 and newer should be injected.

    Hell the tb on my 3.0 mitsu motor in my 94 scaravan says holley on it...

  • nicksta43

    Aug. 7, 2010 10:44 p.m. nicksta43 New Reader

    Junkyard_Dog wrote:

    Yes on the van, only because of what you want to do with it. Stock its pretty crappy.

    Not so much on the Saab. Post GM sludging (?) automatic turd.

    Then again you're talking to a guy washing his 3 Volvos worth a combined $2500*, so what do I know?

    *including the soap and water I've used tonight

    When did G.M. get a hold of Saab anyway?

  • mad_machine

    Aug. 8, 2010 6:21 a.m. mad_machine SuperDork

    94 is the first of the "GM" saabs.. not too much GM content at that point.. but each year closer to now they got more and more GMified

  • Aug. 9, 2010 11:24 a.m. Mikey52_1 Reader

    mad_machine wrote:

    94 is the first of the "GM" saabs.. not too much GM content at that point.. but each year closer to now they got more and more GMified

    And now Saab is an orphink again...I wonder if GM can do ANYthing right...

  • jstein77

    Aug. 9, 2010 11:30 a.m. jstein77 Dork

    I followed the link to the YouTube video on the worlds fastest Caravan, and this came up righ after it:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQM_TyyRye4&NR=1&feature=fvwp

  • Powar

    Aug. 9, 2010 11:32 a.m. Powar Dork

    Mikey52_1 wrote: And now Saab is an orphink again...

    Not really.

  • Klayfish

    Aug. 9, 2010 11:33 a.m. Klayfish New Reader

    If you want to know for sure what year it is, check the VIN. Look at the 10th digit. It will decode as follows:

    F = 1985
    G = 1986
    H = 1987
    J = 1988
    K = 1989

  • SlickDizzy

    Aug. 9, 2010 5:43 p.m. SlickDizzy SuperDork

    Mikey52_1 wrote:

    mad_machine wrote:

    94 is the first of the "GM" saabs.. not too much GM content at that point.. but each year closer to now they got more and more GMified

    And now Saab is an orphink again...I wonder if GM can do ANYthing right...

    Err...wrong...Saab was bought by Spyker and is doing pretty well.

  • Vigo

    Aug. 9, 2010 6:19 p.m. Vigo HalfDork

    Right, saabs and all that, wonderful..

    Can we get back to super cheap, super easy to work on, super useful, and super easy to make fast?

    Last time i checked only the caravan fits..

    I followed the link to the YouTube video on the worlds fastest Caravan, and this came up righ after it:

    Ive looked at that video before, and what that is is a 96-00 AWD caravan (meaning most likely 3.8L) that they put a gear on the driveshaft and connected the turbine to the existing driveshaft with a chain, thus kinda 'backfeeding' a crap load of power into the stock drivetrain. In one of their videos they state that it trapped 98 IN THE 1/8TH MILE. Having owned one of those things before, i would DEFINITELY put way bigger brakes on it before making a full pass with that monster.

    To the OP.. pre-87 vans all had 4 sealed beam headlights, as opposed to the two plastic housings that the 87-90 had. All the 4-light vans were carbed. I also think all the 87-90 vans were injected.

    The tbi looks somewhat like a carbuerator, but it is not.

    So, which front end does it have?

 
Tire Rack- Revolutionizing Tire Buying

You'll need to log in to post.