Login Register Sign up for the GRM e-newsletter

Login to post Forums » Grassroots Motorsports » As newer cars go, am I the only one who likes the looks of the Chevy Malibu? « 1 2 »
  • plance1

    Aug. 3, 2011 1:36 a.m. plance1 Dork

    I'm going to assume I'm all alone on this one...

  • novaderrik

    Aug. 3, 2011 1:50 a.m. novaderrik Dork

    i like it for what it is- a disposable family truckster.

  • mtn

    Aug. 3, 2011 1:54 a.m. mtn SuperDork

    I like it. Bland, but not ugly like most of the segment. Handsome even. If it were RWD, it would be a sleeper (for me at least).

  • sanman

    Aug. 3, 2011 2:18 a.m. sanman Reader

    I like it. I think the sonata and maxima look better though.

  • Aug. 3, 2011 5:08 a.m. petegossett SuperDork

    Yeah I really thought Chevy took the design of this model in the right direction.

  • Nitroracer

    Aug. 3, 2011 5:40 a.m. Nitroracer SuperDork

    Absolutely an improvement over the last two generations.

  • failboat

    Aug. 3, 2011 6:51 a.m. failboat HalfDork

    ^^^ While this is definately true, I still think the rear end styling of the newest model looks like an afterthought. Its not all that attractive imo and just looks sort of cheap.

  • gjz30075

    Aug. 3, 2011 6:52 a.m. gjz30075 Reader

    I like it and I wished they continued the Maxx with this style.

  • Aeromoto

    Aug. 3, 2011 6:53 a.m. Aeromoto New Reader

    As far as looks go, in the most boring car segment of all, it isn't bad. As far as owning and/or giving up my hard earned money for one, I think I'd rather have the clap or hepatitis C.

  • novaderrik

    Aug. 3, 2011 6:55 a.m. novaderrik Dork

    Nitroracer wrote:

    Absolutely an improvement over the last two generations.

    but nowhere near the coolness of the older generations..

  • MA$$hole

    Aug. 3, 2011 7:16 a.m. MA$$hole Reader

    I personally find this car very bland. Too me it just looks like some sort of mashed Intrepid/Camry. Most cars in this segment while not the greatest looking have at least a bold statement, this has none.

  • John Brown

    Aug. 3, 2011 7:21 a.m. John Brown SuperDork

    I like this a lot

  • jrw1621

    Aug. 3, 2011 7:29 a.m. jrw1621 SuperDork

    failboat wrote:

    ^^^ While this is definately true, I still think the rear end styling of the newest model looks like an afterthought. Its not all that attractive imo and just looks sort of cheap.

    Current tailights on many cars leave me wondering. Why are they a combination of mismatched shapes?

  • RossD

    Aug. 3, 2011 7:41 a.m. RossD SuperDork

    I liked it when it switched from the previous body style... but now it starting to look boring to me. At least it doesn't look bad.

  • Aug. 3, 2011 8:12 a.m. dj06482 HalfDork

    I like it...

  • Duke

    Aug. 3, 2011 8:16 a.m. Duke SuperDork

    MA$$hole wrote:

    I personally find this car very bland. Too me it just looks like some sort of mashed Intrepid/Camry. Most cars in this segment while not the greatest looking have at least a bold statement, this has none.

    Me, I take the opposite tack. In this Malibu I see a handsome, understated, well proportioned car. Most other cars these days sacrifice clean design and good proportions just to make a 'bold statement' and don't seem to care that in most cases bold = ugly. I'd rather drive a handsome and understated sedan than something that looks like Dame Edna just so it can make a 'bold statement'.

  • failboat

    Aug. 3, 2011 8:40 a.m. failboat HalfDork

    jrw1621 wrote:

    Current tailights on many cars leave me wondering. Why are they a combination of mismatched shapes?

    Can we blame federal regulations?

    Look what they did to the new Focus. It used to look, dare I say, awesome. Now it looks.....stupid.

    before http://wot.motortrend.com/files/2009/09/25252564.jpeg after http://0.tqn.com/d/cars/1/0/c/S/2/ag_12focus_rearlt1.JPG

  • dculberson

    Aug. 3, 2011 8:56 a.m. dculberson HalfDork

    sanman wrote:

    I like it. I think the sonata and maxima look better though.

    The new Maxima is pleasing looking from some angles, but from the rear it looks fat. Obese, even. It's really hard to find photos of them from straight on behind them - probably because people know it looks awful from that angle.

  • darkbuddha

    Aug. 3, 2011 9:03 a.m. darkbuddha New Reader

    Chevy has a talent for designing their cars with inoffensive looks that have decent durability, unlike some manufacturers that design cars that look severely dated in 5 years. Sure, the last two gens of Malibu weren't great looking cars, but they don't look horribly "old fashioned" even now, some 10+ years later. Heck, I've got an '02 Impala (which I HATE!) and I think it's held it's own in the looks department considering it's now almost 13 years old.

    But as for the original question... do I like it? Uh, not really, but I'm not offended by it either. Go Chevy... yay! (with sarcasm)

  • jrw1621

    Aug. 3, 2011 9:07 a.m. jrw1621 SuperDork

    One of the worst tailights on the Chrysler Sebring. I am not sure what is going on here. Some circle, some oval, some triangle. The lines in the "white" sections do not line up. The trunk piece looks like it came from another car compared the the body part.

  • Klayfish

    Aug. 3, 2011 11:22 a.m. Klayfish HalfDork

    I think the GM designers hit the bullseye that they were probably aiming for. "Inoffensive" without being utterly and totaly boring. That will give it plenty of appeal in the fleet and rental industry, where they can sell them by the truckload.

  • Matt B

    Aug. 3, 2011 11:33 a.m. Matt B Dork

    I think Klayfish hit the bullseye.

    The design is probably pretty successful considering it's purpose in the marketplace.

    My personal reaction: "meh"

  • ppddppdd

    Aug. 3, 2011 11:57 a.m. ppddppdd Reader

    I don't dislike it. The rear half (quarter panel/c-pillar esp) kinda reminds me of the C5 Audi A6 and other parts of it definitely feel a little like early 2000's german stuff.

    American sedans and small cars usually look great to my eye for the first couple years they're around, then horribly outdated. European cars always bug me at first (BANGLE!), but then when they're 5-10 years old they start to look great. Dunno why.

  • GameboyRMH

    Aug. 3, 2011 12:23 p.m. GameboyRMH SuperDork

    Terribly bland. You could slap a Toyota emblem on it and nobody would bat an eye.

  • Aug. 3, 2011 12:27 p.m. NGTD HalfDork

    GameboyRMH wrote:

    Terribly bland. You could slap a Toyota emblem on it and nobody would bat an eye.

    Considering the market GM is after - I think they might take that as a complement.

    I like it. I think they look much better than others in that market segment.

    I can tell you that if you are tall, you will hit your head gtting in them about 75% of the time. They have a very steep rake on the windshield.

« 1 2 »  
Tire Rack- Revolutionizing Tire Buying

You'll need to log in to post.