This is not as horrible as it could have been:
From here (click and scroll down):
This is not as horrible as it could have been:
From here (click and scroll down):
The cover's not so hot, but the rest of it is pretty cool!
Gearheadotaku wrote:The cover's not so hot, but the rest of it is pretty cool!
![]()
I'm willing to cut him some slack on the bed cover, especially considering that he was smart enough to make it out of two trunk lids when vinyl and snaps would have been much easier.
I've seen worse
If I didn't know better, and I don't, I'd say that was factory made in Detroit.
The "check-mark" roof style of the hardtop probably would have been better looking around the B/C pillar. Station wagon tailgate would have allowed for a lower lift-over height.
Not bad though.
Edit: After further examination of pictures of 1963 B-body cars with the check-mark top, I have decided that it would have been a bad idea.
I have never seen the car but the article says that it is located in the town next door to me.
The background of this pictures looks familiar but I can not quite put my finger on the intersection.
That looks like a firehouse in the background, if that helps.
Woody wrote:That looks like a firehouse in the background, if that helps.
Theres a firehouse for sale by my house. I can't afford 450,000xx, but that would be one mean garage. As for the ca... Tru.... Whatever it is, it looks decent. The trunk needs some grinding.
The firehouse has words on the brick of the house portion but I can not make them out.
Surely being a Mopar is should be Belvedage instead of Belvedereamino. Reasonably well done IMO.
Woody wrote:Gearheadotaku wrote:The cover's not so hot, but the rest of it is pretty cool!
![]()
I'm willing to cut him some slack on the bed cover, especially considering that he was smart enough to make it out of two trunk lids when vinyl and snaps would have been much easier.
I would have just left the bed open. The first pic looks older, the cover may have been in better shape then.
I like the station wagon tailgate idea.
Woody wrote:This is not as horrible as it could have been:
But it's every bit as horrible as I expected.
I like it.
Australians like it.
My guess is that the cover was made because it is easier than finishing the bed properly. I envision that if you look under the cover you will see some combination of trunk floor and rear seat floor.
I've seen that done with a Volvo wagon, very similar roof line.
Dan
aw crap now i want to go buy a volvo wagon and do that.
Hmm. I approve of both designs, but I'm highly attracted to the Belvaderamino.
Woody wrote:Gearheadotaku wrote:The cover's not so hot, but the rest of it is pretty cool!
![]()
I'm willing to cut him some slack on the bed cover, especially considering that he was smart enough to make it out of two trunk lids when vinyl and snaps would have been much easier.
Also, the conversion is over 20 years old; it may have looked better when he'd finished it.
Other than the bed cover, it looks factory. Very impressive.