curtis73 wrote:patgizz wrote:rwd with snows. preferably caprice wagon. a 91-96 wagon with snows is unstoppable and has taken me past many ditched 4x4 suv's
One of my best was an 86 Caprice with posi.
One of the more compelling factors in snow performance is the weight of the vehicle vs with width of the tires. Light car plus wide tires equals snowshoes. You ride on top and have a terrible time getting traction. Heavy car plus skinny tires equals hello pavement.
Many argue that FWD is superior in snow. IMHO, those people have fallen for the propaganda solicieted by Lee Iacocca and the K-car. Snow performance is a function of being able to get moving, being able to maximize traction on both axis positive and negative, and how the vehicle reacts when traction is lost.
I personally prefer RWD because it separates the drive wheels from the steering wheels. If you lose traction with the front wheels in a FWD car, you also loose steering. Try it in a parking lot some snowy day. Drive along in a straight line, floor the pedal to make it lose traction, and you can turn lock to lock without appreciably affecting the direction of the car.
I would list these factors as my choices for snow vehicles:
- RWD or AWD. not 4wd or FWD
- automatic (for the elasticity of control you typically have over the application of torque to the wheels)
- relatively skinny tires so that the contact patch is oriented longitudinally to the car.
- no traction control... at least not until they make it better.
A second - on all counts. Skinniest tires that you can find in a very good snow pattern with a good heater make the best difference. ABS is fine if you're serious about just driving, but without is way more fun and can actually help if you think like Isaac Newton when you're driving.


This car, with a set of Hakkapeliittas was wonderful in the snow. Stick shift & RWD equals mirth-a-plenty!