Thanks for all the replies.
I'm not married to the idea of using the Goldwing motor. The Goldwing motor was mostly driven by packaging constraints and the fact that they have an electric reverse which I hope would be good enough to get me out of a parking spot. The trans on them is also nicely tucked up against the back side of the motor.
Here are the Goldwing transmission ratios:
(1) 2.375 (38/16)
(2) 1.454 (32/22)
(3) 1.068 (31/29)
(4) 0.843 (27/32)
(5) 0.686 (24/35)
Primary Reduction is 1.591 (78/49)
As you can see the gears in the trans are rather tall. I figure I can live with a combined final drive ratio of 1:5.25 - 1:5.5 (gives 70mph @ 3750-4000 rpms), so:
5.5 / 1.591 = approx. what my rear end ratio needs to be.
I have designed the car around NA Miata wheels and tires. I can't really go taller on the tires to help my situation due to packaging issues. The car is berkeleying small, think 110% of a Berkeley, with a roof. (75in. wheelbase.) It's like a GT micro-car; an answer to a question nobody has asked.
I am open to hearing of other small (short from front to back) drive trains that don't involve chains. It's going in the front, and RWD car transmissions kinda end up occupying space I need for my feet, so that's another constraint that led to the Goldwing.
It may be that there is no good solution and that my car has to get bigger.