Login Register Sign up for the GRM e-newsletter

Login to post Forums » Grassroots Motorsports » considering a MkIV Golf or Jetta - what should I look for? « 1 2 »
  • Dec. 13, 2009 3:07 p.m. m3shane None

    I'm thinking of 2001-2004. What should I look for, what should I be aware of, how much should I expect to spend for one with less than 100K mi?

    Specifically I'd like to know about the reliability of the 1.8T. I know the non-turbo 2.0 will last forever, but I'm concerned about buying a used turbo. This car needs to last to 200K miles.

  • HiTempguy

    Dec. 15, 2009 10:06 p.m. HiTempguy Reader

    m3shane wrote:

    I'm thinking of 2001-2004. What should I look for, what should I be aware of, how much should I expect to spend for one with less than 100K mi?

    Specifically I'd like to know about the reliability of the 1.8T. I know the non-turbo 2.0 will last forever, but I'm concerned about buying a used turbo. This car needs to last to 200K miles.

    Don't get a 2.sl0w. I had one, did some work to it. They are SLOW, and I got worse gas mileage on a 5000km trip to Vegas and back then my buddies in their chipped 1.8T's :( There is no reason not to get a 1.8T now, since their prices have come way down. Spring for an '03 or newer (bigger turbo).

    I've actually found MOST MK4 VW's to be very reliable. And if they have an electric problem, the VAGcom is great at telling you what the issue is :D

  • SpeedTheory

    Dec. 15, 2009 10:14 p.m. SpeedTheory Reader

    What should you look for? A different vehicle.

    The dash does look very holiday-themed on them though, typically it could be mistaken for a Christmas tree with all the lights on/flashing.

  • Travis_K

    Dec. 16, 2009 1:28 a.m. Travis_K Dork

    The only person i know that has one doesnt like it much.

  • Rufledt

    Dec. 16, 2009 2:27 a.m. Rufledt Reader

    yeah electrical problems. my brother's MKIV had manual roll windows for that exact reason- one of the few newer cars i've seen with manual windows.

  • DukeOfUndersteer

    Dec. 16, 2009 8:33 a.m. DukeOfUndersteer Dork

    Well, if you get a Mk4 1.8t, go for the 2001.5, thats when the wideband O2 sensor came out, alot easier to tune. In 2002, the 1.8t had a horsepower bump from 150 to 180hp, so id say a 2002 and up Mk4 1.8T, then i could flash it for you and get you 210hp!

  • Ian F

    Dec. 16, 2009 9:03 a.m. Ian F HalfDork

    I've occasionally thought of a 1.8T GTI as a track-beater, since after 200K miles in my '03 Jetta wagon, I'm familiar with how they drive and removign most of the interior bits would greatly reduce the number of places for the gremlins to nest... Prices haven't quite come down enough yet...

    IMHO, buying one of these will be a crap shoot... for every person that tells you it'll be an electrical and CEL nightmare, there is someone like me who has driven one 200K miles since new with nary an issue. However, I'm no fan-boi to the point of saying they aren't without their possible issues...

    That said, aftermarket support is good and DIY support is great. If they have one major fault for a performance application it's a somewhat less than optimal suspension design.

  • slefain

    Dec. 16, 2009 9:15 a.m. slefain Dork

    m3shane wrote:

    This car needs to last to 200K miles.

    The engine will last 200k, but the rest of the car won't. Manual transmission is a requirement, try to find one with non-power everything. The fewer toys, the happier you will be.

  • gimpstang

    Dec. 16, 2009 9:22 a.m. gimpstang New Reader

    Get the VR6 motor. Less tunable than the 1.8T but fewer issues and a much more drivable engine. I've had my 03 GTI with the 24 valve VR6 since new and have only had two problems with it.
    1. Serpentine belt broke while on track, fixed it and im good. 2. Alternator went out, fixed it and im good also.

    132000 miles and still in great shape.

  • wheelsmithy

    Dec. 16, 2009 9:36 a.m. wheelsmithy New Reader

    What's a VAGcom? Sounds dirty.

  • Ian F

    Dec. 16, 2009 9:38 a.m. Ian F HalfDork

    Interesting. We had a VR6 for awhile... swore I'd never lay a hand on one of those blessed lumps again...

  • 93celicaGT2

    Dec. 16, 2009 9:43 a.m. 93celicaGT2 SuperDork

    The VR6 is god's left hand of V6s. The right hand is the KLZE.

  • scardeal

    Dec. 16, 2009 12:04 p.m. scardeal Reader

    Well, then His Right Foot (the one that does the stomping and smashing) is a VQ...

  • EricM

    Dec. 16, 2009 12:15 p.m. EricM Dork

    I had one, a MkIV VW. Get a scan tool because you need to clear the CEL every week.

    Stock up on Coil Packs, even the replacement ones die randomely.

    they are a little "pigish" as in heavy. So even though the 1.8 turbo can be tuned, you still have to haul around a tank.

    And mine ate wheel bearings. Even with a Bilstein Set up (PSS9) and a rear Anti-sway bar it still pushed something fierce. The "Monsoon" sound system sucked to high heavon as well. Other then that they are kinda fun.. I guess.

  • m4ff3w

    Dec. 16, 2009 12:17 p.m. m4ff3w Dork

    93celicaGT2 wrote:

    The VR6 is god's left hand of V6s. The right hand is the KLZE.

    Alfa V6 > KLZE or VR6

  • 81gtv6

    Dec. 16, 2009 12:23 p.m. 81gtv6 Reader

    m4ff3w wrote:

    93celicaGT2 wrote:

    The VR6 is god's left hand of V6s. The right hand is the KLZE.

    Alfa V6 > KLZE or VR6

    • a bunch
  • Ian F

    Dec. 16, 2009 4:42 p.m. Ian F HalfDork

    wheelsmithy wrote:

    What's a VAGcom? Sounds dirty.

    Laptop diagnostic tool sold by www.ross-tech.com. You pretty much can't seriously do DIY wrenching on a VW without it.

  • digdug18

    Dec. 16, 2009 10:32 p.m. digdug18 New Reader

    i dunno about you guys but the quattro a4's are getting damn cheap in the 2.8 trim now adays.... yeah the 2.8 has a E36 M3 load less support the the 1.8t, but then again it cost less to get to the 200k mile mark as well.

    Andrew

  • DukeOfUndersteer

    Dec. 17, 2009 7:40 a.m. DukeOfUndersteer Dork

    the 2.8 V6s are terrible motors...

  • Ian F

    Dec. 17, 2009 10:01 a.m. Ian F HalfDork

    DukeOfUndersteer wrote: the 2.8 V6s are terrible motors...

    Yeah... wish I'd known that BEFORE I bought my (used) A4... that blew up on the drive home from the dealer...

  • HiTempguy

    Dec. 17, 2009 5:47 p.m. HiTempguy Reader

    digdug18 wrote:

    i dunno about you guys but the quattro a4's are getting damn cheap in the 2.8 trim now adays.... yeah the 2.8 has a E36 M3 load less support the the 1.8t, but then again it cost less to get to the 200k mile mark as well.

    Andrew

    2.8L Audi V6 != 2.8L VW VR6

  • aussiesmg

    Dec. 17, 2009 6:06 p.m. aussiesmg SuperDork

    Can you say M.A.Z.D.A.

  • Ian F

    Dec. 17, 2009 8:54 p.m. Ian F Dork

    HiTempguy wrote: 2.8L Audi V6 != 2.8L VW VR6

    Umm... I hope "!=" is supposed to mean "not equal" as the Audi 2.8 is not a VR6.

  • Treb

    Dec. 17, 2009 9:34 p.m. Treb Reader

    DukeOfUndersteer wrote:

    the 2.8 V6s are terrible motors...

    Not to threadjack... but why?

    Somewhat closer to the topic...the sound from a VR6 has always struck me as weird. (Odd firing pulses?) Matt

  • Helterskelter

    Dec. 18, 2009 12:58 a.m. Helterskelter Reader

    VR6 has the firing pulses of an inline 6, I believe.

« 1 2 »  

You'll need to log in to post.