I looked through the magazines but couldn't find it.
But basically they were saying how even though the area where the ball mount goes is thick steel, its not that thick the whole way through, and the torsional load that a moderately heavy trailer puts on the ball during heavy braking or other forward and backward motion puts HUGE stresses on the generally large flat ball mount surface of the bumper. The mounting points for the bumper are spread pretty far apart, so you have the potential for a general twisting of the ball mount area. Once it twists the slightest bit it loses its rigidity and apparently its not unheard for the ball to simply rip right out of the ball mount, and the trailer to come crashing into the rear of the vehicle or worse.
The receiver hitch uses thick square tubing with 2 big crossmemers closely spaced going directly to the frame to resist the bending.
And as most of us personally can vouch, if you back an f150 into a pole with the stock bumper/ball mount, you are looking at a dented bumper. If you back an F150 with a receiver hitch into a pole, you are looking at an uprooted pole, generally speaking. So if there is a question of strength, receiver hitch clearly wins.
I dunno. When you start looking at your average utility trailer that might weigh between 1000 and 2500 lbs even unloaded with no brakes, and you think of how that entire trailer is funneling all its inertia into a tiny ball during heavy (think ABS activiating) braking, its got to amount a multiplier of thousands and thousands of pounds. Push the trailer weight up above that and it must get rediculous fast. You wouldn't think of exerting that kind of force on any other stamped mild steel piece in single sheer, but somehow people don't think twice about it towing trailers...
IMO, hope for the best but plan for the worst. Hope you won't crash into something and your trailer fly through the tailgate and through the back of the cab, but plan on keeping that from happening, just in case.