GameboyRMH wrote:Few FWD cars would make good RWD cars considering the weight distribution and suspension issues...otherwise, I'd say all of them. I prefer laterally mounted engines over longitudinally mounted engines but I prefer RWD to FWD.
Thats mostly due to the engineering process by which the cars are produced. The converse would likely be true also if you were to convert a rwd to fwd (blasphemy?) I dont understand why you would prefer a transversely mounted engine to a longitudinally mounted engine. Most of the transversely mounted engines I've seen have not been in a good spot with respect to weight distribution (read: off to one side and/or in front of the front axle). Personally I'd rather have the engine directly on the center line of the car and situated in between the axles somewhere. At least longitudinal mounted engines qualify for at least one of those most of the time, whether its fwd or rwd. I suppose you could make the arguement for counter-acting the weight of the driver being offset...
