Are the captions messed up in the first couple of pages in the newest mag? Mine seems to mention something about adding a couple of cylinders to a Porsche but shows a picture of a "something else that I can't quite identify". Also, the "Stuck on You" section doesn't seem to go with the picture.
Is it just me?
Rob
Nope not the only one...
http://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/is-a-taurus-a-miata-or-is-a-miata-a-tau...
In reply to wvumtnbkr:
I noticed that too.
Yeah, the color proofs look good, but we have a bad feeling that some links somehow got broken. I'll ask JG to post a more technically correct answer. Sorry about that.
I noticed a photo of a 1970-1973 Pontiac Firebird where the caption referred to it as a Camaro. 
David S. Wallens wrote:Yeah, the color proofs look good, but we have a bad feeling that some links somehow got broken. I'll ask JG to post a more technically correct answer. Sorry about that.
We screwed a couple things up. It happens.
jg
Okay, what actually happened in a couple cases is that some photos were renamed with names that had been used previously (like "Stuck on You" for example). When the file went looking for the photo called "Stuck on You" it grabbed a photo with the same name from a previous issue. Maybe a drive didn't spin up fast enough, maybe a cable was loose, who knows. We're now adding date tags to file names on recurring items, or even items with names that may be so generic we'll use them again (Like "Man using spring compressor.jpg").
Computers are stupid.
jg
JG Pasterjak wrote:Computers are stupid.
jg
Read in Hal Voice:Im not amused J.G.
I'm sure I'm starting something here that I will deeply, deeply regret, but...
"I'm afraid you can't put an LS in that, Dave."
For all of our FSAE stuff, we append a date to EVERY file in the form of YYYYMMDD. Helps keep stuff like that from happening, Solidworks is terrible with references if part names are the same.
