Me, neither. The reason I chose Triumph for my "first marque" was because at the time (I was 12yrs old in 1974), they were the only Britcar company that actually made the attempt at building a "modern" car. I'd seen the Datsun 240z, and knew that such engineering was the future. I cursed BL for not doing any design work, and hoping the "dumb" Americans would just keep buying the same ol' stuff we'd been buying since the end of the Second World War. They were my "team", right? I've always treated motorsport the same way my fellow Southerners do their "stickanball" stuff...
I awaited with glee for the mating of the Dolomite 16v with this new chassis, but for us in the US, it never happened. I was almost ecstatic when the TR8 came out..I reallly thought it would save the company, at least long enough for me to buy a new one once I'd finished college and found a real job.
I guess that since I was young & passionate, I never really understood how dire the situation was for Triumph.
And to this day, I don't know why people call the lil' wedges "ugly". The coupes were a little strange, but the convertables look more like a car from the 1990s than the 1970s.
Ironically, there were more TR7s sold in the US than any other Triumph model. The real TR8s were sold in much smaller numbers (a lot of Britcar experts say there's probably less than 3000 of them left in the world), but as long as you're honest about the thing..take the car, shove a V8 in it, buck up the brakes, and drive the berkeley out of it. It'll be a lot cheaper than sourcing a Dolomite 16v...
BTW: One of my favorite memories about running in SCCA Improved Touring was watching a guy here in SEDIV running a TR-7. IIRC, it was classed in ITB (along with my 1800cc VW Golf Mk.1). We all ran away from him on the straights, but we had to make sure he wasn't behind us on the twisty bits...I still recall him outbraking me into Turn 3 at Road Atlanta, and almost bumping the ITA Mazda FB RX-7 in front of us because he was so much faster through The Esses.