Login Register Sign up for the GRM e-newsletter

Login to post Forums » Grassroots Motorsports » Pitot Tube in the exhaust for crankcase venting
  • DILYSI Dave

    March 21, 2009 11:55 p.m. DILYSI Dave UltimaDork

    Since I'm now boosted, and that can play hell with the stock PCV system, I'm considering scrapping the stock stuff entirely and putting a pitot tube into the exhaust stream, and hooking the valvecover vent to it. Anyone played with this?

    Summit has a few kits for this. http://store.summitracing.com/partdetail.asp?autofilter=1&part=SUM-120108&...

    From reading online, some people love them, some hate them.

  • Trans_Maro

    March 22, 2009 1:04 a.m. Trans_Maro Reader

    You need an exhaust with NO backpressure for them to work effectively.

    Shawn

  • blaze86vic

    March 22, 2009 1:38 a.m. blaze86vic Reader

    Yeah, if you have a restrictive exhaust it won't work. I too am interested in a solution to this dilemma. I was thinking that an electric vacuum pump may be the solution, but it's low on my priority list of things to design up right now so I haven't done much beyond concepts.

  • stan_d

    March 22, 2009 7:49 a.m. stan_d Dork

    my plan is to make a oil air seperator then hook it to intake pipe in front of turbo

  • March 22, 2009 7:56 a.m. warpedredneck New Reader

    used that system in the stock car(late model circle track) worked well, had to change the valve frequently, 3 times a season. it would really start to smoke!

  • March 22, 2009 7:58 a.m. ncjay New Reader

    Many drag racers use this system so it must work well enough, but they only need it for a few seconds at a time and they sure don't have any back pressure. A vacuum pump is a great idea and you'd probably see more benefit from that over running a tube into the exhaust.

  • DILYSI Dave

    March 22, 2009 8:04 a.m. DILYSI Dave UltimaDork

    Exhaust isn't restrictive - 3" straight pipe into a turn down. That's it.

    I could do the vacuum pump, or separator, or other stuff, but it's more weight and more complexity. If it will work, I REALLY like the simplicity of this.

    Warped - when you say you had to change the valve - I assume you're talking about the check valve? I was wondering if it's even necessary to run it.

  • P71

    March 22, 2009 8:37 a.m. P71 Dork

    I was always happy with running a vented catch can. Summit sells some plastic NHRA-legal ones for cheap (~$20?). I ran a hose from the OEM breather port on the valve cover to it and from the OEM PCV port on the cranckcase to it plus capped off the oil-sucking port on the intake. Worked like a dream in a turbo car, cheap, and you can keep track of blow-by.

    The pitot idea sounds brutally simple and effective though...

  • fifty

    March 22, 2009 8:53 a.m. fifty New Reader

    P71 wrote:

    I was always happy with running a vented catch can. Summit sells some plastic NHRA-legal ones for cheap (~$20?). I ran a hose from the OEM breather port on the valve cover to it and from the OEM PCV port on the cranckcase to it plus capped off the oil-sucking port on the intake. Worked like a dream in a turbo car, cheap, and you can keep track of blow-by.

    Same here, I stuffed it with steel wool to encourage the oil vapor to condense in the catch can. Had a drain hole with a stopcock tapped on the bottom of the catch can, would bleed off the oil periodically.

    It was kinda stinky when it was venting, but it was a "race only" vehicle.

  • ww

    March 22, 2009 1:42 p.m. ww Dork

    I'll be interested to see what you come up with.

 

You'll need to log in to post.