P71 wrote:
I am so tired of the new GTO vs old GTO argument.
The original 64 GTO was nothing special to look at, and with the exception of the Judge sticker package, no GTO was flashy. They were meant to go fast and be unassuming. I can't believe that so many people think only of a bright orange 69 Judge as "the GTO" when they were made fun of for so long. You're telling me that a 350 or 400HP car with a real 6-Speed manual, RWD, good handling, and tremendous performance for the price isn't a GTO because it didn't look 40 years old already? In 2005 the C6 Vette came out with 400HP and the LS2. The GTO had the exact same engine and rating. That will never happen again (see 430HP Vette vs 426HP Camaro).
Pontiac was always the "innovator" of GM, often telling corporate to shove of. They had the turbine-powered Firebird show cars in the 50's, the original "Wide-Track", the Super Duty race cars, the original muscle car in the GTO, the rear-tranaxle Tempest, the original luxury GT in the Grand Am, the better of the f-cars with WS6 suspension packages, the unique Fiero, the Banshee show car, supercharging the Grand National V6 and making power available to the masses in FWD cars, the 4-seat Vette (new GTO), the M3 fighter G8, etc, etc. It will truly be a sad, sad day when Pontiac closes up. Probably the most significant closure since AMC.
Let me elaborate on my previous post because I agree with p71's above post. They brought a car that looked like an inflated grand am and called it a gto. Thats the problem I had with the car. I realize that the original one was not flashy and what not, but it didnt look like a crappy outdated car when it first appeared either. Thats my opinion. I dont think anyone will discount the GTO on pure technical data, because you'd need a new z06 or more to do that.