Always interested in the coolest car for the least money, I started thinking about 912s. I know they suffer from a but of an inferiority complex because they're virtually identical to 911s. I imagine drivers of 912s always having to tell people it's just a 4-cylinder, not a 911. Over time, that could do something to a man, you know.
I know the first 912s had the 356SC engine (I think), so they have more cred than the 1976 912s with the VW Type IV engine. But are they all that bad? I had a Vanagon with the air-cooled Type IV, and it was great--when it ran. I attribute the Vanagon engine's horribleness to it having to propel what was essentially a full-size van with 67 bhp. I suspect in a 912, the engine would be less stressed, and just be much better.
Any 912 experience, impressions, image problems?

