The story goes that because European safety standards changed for 2000, Lotus needed help to make a replacement for the first-generation Elise.
General Motors answered that call for help, and the two companies struck a deal to co-produce the new car.
Under the GM badge, the new cars would be sold as the Opel Speedster and the Vauxhall VX220. Instead …
Totally forgot the Speedster and VX220 existed. The styling looks a little down rent from the Elise, eh?
nderwater said:Totally forgot the Speedster and VX220 existed. The styling looks a little down rent from the Elise, eh?
I feel like there is definitely more GM than Lotus in that 'style'.
Honestly like better than the lotus body
Patrick (Forum Supporter) said:Honestly like better than the lotus body
Because it's a better design in your eyes or because this is something rarely, if ever, seen in the US?
In reply to iansane (Forum Supporter) :
I agree with Patrick. I like the speedster version of the body better. I just think it looks better, I've always found the Elise to be a bit too insect-y.
I've always preferred a more "machine" look to my cars as opposed to a "biological" look.
For example: I like the way Honda's look (pretty much always), prefer the C5 or C7 over the C6, Fiata over the Miata, don't care for the '57 Chevy, and think the E36 M3 looks better than the E46.
I also prefer a 2mm lead holder over a regular wooden pencil.
Having seen VX220s on the road, it is one of the very few cars that looks better in photos than it does in person. Still looks better than a base series 2 Elise though. Not better than a seies 1 though.
Huh, I never knew they were directly related to the Elise.
Ecotec. Ew.
To my eye, the Elise looks like a mini exotic car. In the Vox I'm seeing Pontiac Grand Prix in the nose, MR2-S in the headlights, some Altima in the tail and SN95 Mustang in the tacked on side scoops. Go figure.
Those taillights. Ugh.
Any model Elise looks better to me.
Looks like an mr2 spyder to my untrained eye.
We are getting between 400 and 500 bhp with the 2.0 Ecotec, without going inside the engine (although above the low 400s one is wel advised to consider some bottom end longevity mods). That car would be interesting with one of those modern Ecotecs in it!
5 more years.. what are these selling for in Europland?
wspohn said:We are getting between 400 and 500 bhp with the 2.0 Ecotec, without going inside the engine (although above the low 400s one is wel advised to consider some bottom end longevity mods). That car would be interesting with one of those modern Ecotecs in it!
Hmmm "We" can you expound on this .....I have a 1973 MGB/GT......perhaps PM would be more appropriate...
Any chance that either variant is import legal?
In reply to Sil80redtop :
Not yet.
Definitely looks more like a Solstice than a Lotus and not in a good way. It's not bad, per se, but as iansane noted there appears to be a lot more GM than Lotus in the design.
759NRNG (Forum Partidario) said:wspohn said:We are getting between 400 and 500 bhp with the 2.0 Ecotec, without going inside the engine (although above the low 400s one is wel advised to consider some bottom end longevity mods). That car would be interesting with one of those modern Ecotecs in it!
Hmmm "We" can you expound on this .....I have a 1973 MGB/GT......perhaps PM would be more appropriate...
There is a large tuning community for the Solstice/Sky and Cobalt owners. I stopped when I got from a stock 260 bhp/260 Tq to 375 bhp/375 Tq (that just required a larger impeller wheel and a retune) but the limit is way above that. You can stick an Ecotec in an MGB but it requires some packaging work as it is a fairly tall engine. They have stuck them in Miatas, Lotus 7 etc. At worst you would probably need a mild hood bulge but if it interfered with the front cross member you might need to do a front suspension conversion to make room (readily available kits, just a bit more money
You'll need to log in to post.
