Does this mean they're back in the game?
http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2098090,00.html
-
Oct. 28, 2011 10:52 p.m. David S. Wallens Editorial Director
-
Oct. 28, 2011 10:59 p.m. Streetwiseguy Dork
$141 million seems like a lot of money to pay for a company that hasn't made a dime in a couple decades, but I don't really grasp the concepts of multinational corporation high finances. Or government finances. I just pay my Visa card off every month...
-
Oct. 29, 2011 6:15 a.m. mad_machine SuperDork
who knows how much money saab actually made. Since GM owned them, they have been playing a shell game with the finances
-
Oct. 29, 2011 7:23 a.m. dean1484 SuperDork
You could see some intresting cars from saab if this goes through.
-
Oct. 29, 2011 11:40 a.m. car39 HalfDork
GM sold SAAB for more than 360 million, so 141 isn't such a bad price. The Chinese have taken a hands off approach at Volvo (so far) maybe it isn't the end for Svenska Aeorplan AktieBolaget
-
Oct. 29, 2011 4:07 p.m. fifty Reader
It'll be interesting to see if they continue to run Saab as an automotive company. If I were a Chinese manufacturer , I'd strip Saab of it's intellectual and physical holdings to help make better vehicles (since Chinese cars are crap) and then dump it.
