djhives wrote:
those who dont like working/repairing cars have that attitude of 'unreliable' high-mileage car...
Quoted for truth. I've never had a car that was significantly less than 100K on it when I got ahold of it, and the only DD that ever gave me grief was a Mexican A3 Jetta that managed 150K and eight years of service in my hands before the wiring harness turned to jelly. I loved it, but I love most VWs made before the turn of the century.
My ex-wife HATED that car and would always point out its faults, mainly because it was aging like a Mexican Jetta: it would start, drive and stop like a champion, but only 1 power window worked, it blew turn signal fuses at an alarming rate, and it went through 3 stereos in the time I owned it. It made noises, which scared her witless, and she refused my (usually) reasoned explanation of how everything was fine, I just needed to look at X at some point.
She never got it.
This culminated in us driving her terrible but low-mileage Saturn from Kentucky to Florida because "she didn't trust my car." Um, dear, my car isn't the 40k Saturn throwing misfire codes and turning its cat converter into molten slag. She didn't know enough about mechanics to understand what happened how, and so I had to nurse a 3 cylinder Saturn 800 miles there and back due to pure willful ignorance.
So, OP, to speak to your dilemma: some people won't understand how you'd feel better in a 200K mile car that you have a ton of knowledge and mechanical sympathy for then you would in something new you don't know shizz about. (Those people also happen to be the first ones to come to you with car questions.) I'd say eff it and do what you and the missus want to do, and if her dad doesn't understand why, I don't think you'll ever be able to explain. Such is the way of the motoring enthusiast.
However, the trip I just described was my honeymoon, so maybe you should get the rental.