Login Register Sign up for the GRM e-newsletter

Login to post Forums » Grassroots Motorsports » Spitfire build thread « 1 2 »
  • Curmudgeon

    July 10, 2011 6:49 p.m. Curmudgeon SuperDork

    For a race only car I'd stick with the rough shell you already have. No point hunting down a nice Mk 1 body just to beat it up, all you need is a '50/50' (looks good at 50 feet at 50 MPH) car.

    Body differences: Mk I, II and III (1962-1970) all use the small taillights. The Mk I and II 1962-1967 have the bumpers 'low' (under the front turn signal lights), the Mk III (1968-1970) have the bumpers 'high' (above the front turn signal lights). The doors etc are all the same except the Mk III cars had the 'anti burst' outside door handles. Mk IV and 1500 (1971-1980) all have the 'flat tail' style body witht e big taillights and very little interchanges. But come to think of it, a door from a 1980 will hang right on a 1962 and the body lines etc will match up (the door latch mechanisms won't, though).

  • 93EXCivic

    July 29, 2011 4:49 p.m. 93EXCivic SuperDork

    Woohoo parts are starting to get in. I got an old Mini MS and taillights. And I am about send money for GT6 front uprights and front brakes.

    With the Mini MS, I can control the fuel with that and run the ignition off the distributor correct?

  • 93EXCivic

    Aug. 14, 2011 5:21 p.m. 93EXCivic SuperDork

    Ok so lots of pictures of rust.

    Not sure what to call this panel but right in front of door on side of firewall.

    Door sill. The other looks ok from the outside but I doubt it really is.

    Trunk area.

    Trunk area again

    Rear wheel well

    Behind passenger seat

    Behind driver's side door.

  • 93EXCivic

    Aug. 14, 2011 5:24 p.m. 93EXCivic SuperDork

    Inside passenger's side door

    Floor board

    Fiberglass

    More fiberglass

    Friend's car where I am working.

  • 93EXCivic

    Aug. 14, 2011 5:24 p.m. 93EXCivic SuperDork

    Also the roll bar came out today and the trunk was cleaned out. I found a brand new head gasket and intake gasket in there. As well as a bunch of useless rusted parts like a air cleaner cover for an old Ford.

  • Curmudgeon

    Aug. 14, 2011 5:56 p.m. Curmudgeon SuperDork

    Rust sucks. But on a Spitfire, it's not the end of the world due to the body on frame construction. The rockers do have a lot to do with fore/aft stiffness and how well the doors close so I would put the effort into fixing them properly but the rest of it is no biggie from a structural standpoint.

    For real stiffness, a properly designed roll bar or cage is the secret. I went through a LOT of head scratching before I finalized the Abomination's roll bar design and as a result it stiffened the body tremendously, see if Toyman will send you some pics.

  • 93EXCivic

    Aug. 14, 2011 6:09 p.m. 93EXCivic SuperDork

    I am planning on doing some major work on the sills. Basically next step is weld in some bars and pull the body off.

  • 93EXCivic

    Aug. 20, 2011 5:41 p.m. 93EXCivic SuperDork

    CASC tag. Vehicle number 5108.

    Spitfire this morning.

    Airborne Spitfire

    Bracing welded in the car

    Frame and body apart

    Rear end

    Double swaybars on the front.

    Rear trailling links. I don't know what to think of those.

    Soon to be RallyX car.

  • erohslc

    Aug. 20, 2011 10:24 p.m. erohslc Reader

    Hmm, has the swing spring setup, that's not stock on that model. Those training links (my FSM calls them radius arms) are not stock, and look dicey to me; taking a bite out of a stressed tube is no way to maintan strength. To gain clearance there for straight arms, you can simply put a spacer tube where the arm mounts to keep the tabs from crushing closed, use a longer bolt, and mount the arms to the inside of the inner tab. The flat horizontal tabs sticking forward from the uprights where the radius arms attach are not stock, they were probably used for a camber compensator. Double sway bars? Why, when bars are widely available in sizes up to 1"? Looks like someone torched a section out of the front frame crossmember between the frame rails. It doesn't add that much stiffness, but hey, a Spitfire can use all the chassis stiffness you can manage, so I'd be looking to put that back. The steering rack mounts and sway bar mounts look like solid pieces of Delrin. The left front motor mount is not stock, wonder what motor was in the car?

    Interesting ....

  • 93EXCivic

    Aug. 20, 2011 11:01 p.m. 93EXCivic SuperDork

    The car has the 1296 motor which isn't stock. I was wondering about the spring setup. I knew the trailing arms were stock when I saw the rod ends.

  • Ian F

    Aug. 21, 2011 8:00 a.m. Ian F SuperDork

    I would strongly reconsider doing any major rust remediation with the body off the frame. I've read of many who have done that, thinking it would be easier, only to find the mounts won't line up when they were done. Yes, they installed bars to support the tub as well. Don't underestimate the flimsiness of a Spitfire tub...

    That car needs SO much work, I think I'd look for another tub... You're looking at probably close to $1000 worth of repair panels, if not more... Anyone who has seen my 1800ES would be surprised to see me write that, but Spitfires grow on trees compared to old Volvos.

  • T.J.

    Aug. 21, 2011 8:18 a.m. T.J. SuperDork

    I like the optimism of ordering a programmable ECU at this stage. That's a lot of rust.

  • Curmudgeon

    Aug. 21, 2011 8:44 a.m. Curmudgeon SuperDork

    Those double sway bars: damn they wanted the thing to push, didn't they? FWIW: the best handling AX Spitfires I've seen have massively stiff front springs and minimal sway bars, making the car corner very 'flat'. Probably not a real good idea for road racing, though. The front springs look a bit spindly.

    Hard to tell for sure from the pictures but it looks to me like the steering rack may have been moved back. Stock Spitfires have the rack too far forward making for some really weird Ackerman. On the stock setup, if viewed from above the tie rods sweep back, when they really should be either straight or sweep slightly forward. Problem is, when in the best location the rack occupies roughly the same spot as the #1 connecting rod journal and the rod journal wins that fight. Unless the engine is moved back... As always, check the rule book first!

    That radius arm doesn't give me the warm fuzzies either. It looks like they were notched for tire clearance. If you look at the 'box member' at the rear of the floor pan, you should see 2 rubber plugs on either side of the driveshaft tunnel. Those are the radius arm mount points for the GT6 suspension meaning you can easily move the mount points inboard. You'd need to make new radius arms but that's not a big deal since there are already rod ends in place. It's not possible to really fark up the weird Spitfire suspension geometry any more than the factory did so I wouldn't be too concerned about that.

    Early Spits had shorter axles and rear springs than the late cars so I'd say that's probably a late differential (4 mount bolts for the spring clamp, early diffs had 6) with most likely a GT6 rear spring. That was a common modification and would not be a true 'swing spring' unless someone did a good bit of custom work back there.

    Swing spring or no, you are best off limiting the downward travel of the rear axles to lessen the massive camber change under braking that Spits are capable of. The easy way is to use shocks with shorter travel, IIRC there's a Corvette rear shock from the Stingray body style that's a nearly direct bolt on that will limit the travel. Or, I've seen travel limiters made from aircraft cable and even chains. You just don't want them to droop into the area occupied by other stuff like axles etc. From the pictures, it appears this may have already been done, which is A Good Thing.

  • 93EXCivic

    Aug. 22, 2011 10:26 a.m. 93EXCivic SuperDork

    The body has already been on and off the frame several times and it is still lining up. My big worry is cutting the door sills out. I need to figure out rules stuff. Since it has racing heritage I am thinking vintage racing but I know really nothing about the rules for vintage racing. I know it is a lot of rust but I am not to worried. I haves full welding shop available for use, plenty of time and a set of body hammers. also I really doubt I will find a MK1 body shell in better shape. As far as shocks, I was thinking about motorcycle shocks but I need to look at rules.

  • Ian F

    Aug. 22, 2011 10:37 a.m. Ian F SuperDork

    Well, as mentioned over on the CMS forums, the rules for vintage allowances varies wildly. IMO, check what groups run in your area, then see what their requirements are. The front shocks, being an OE coil-over, is somewhat free, but you may be stuck with the transverse spring in the rear under any set of vintage rules.

    My point about the body and frame mainly applies when doing major work that could affect the body mounts - like replacing the sill panels where you're cutting away a major portion of the tub's structure. I mention it because I've seen it happen to guys who thought they had taken the proper precautions.

  • 93EXCivic

    Aug. 22, 2011 10:52 a.m. 93EXCivic SuperDork

    I will probably do the door sills while the body is bolted onto the frame. I was thinking on the rear removing the spring from the motorcycle shocks and keeping the leaf spring.

  • erohslc

    Aug. 25, 2011 11:18 p.m. erohslc Reader

    In reply to Curmudgeon: Note the 4 bolt swing spring mounting box bolted to the top of the diff, ie it is a swing spring. Fixed springs just use a simple flat plate on top. One of the cheapest easiest ways to get custom radius arms with heims is just order them from the Coleman catalog in the desired length. The Spitfire pan already sits over the rack, so moving it back may involve surgery to the oil pan for clearance. OTOH, if you must also raise the rack, then it becomes a clearance issue with #1 conrod. IMHO swing spring is an inherent compromise. Better to have fixed spring and seperate camber compensator. This allows you to tune the CC independently of the spring, ie pre-load by changing the length of the links from CC tip to axle carrier. The limiting straps/chains/cables have an inherent problem, in that when they reach the limit of downward travel, there is a sudden change in effective wheel spring rate, ie, no spring at all except for the tire deflection. This can lead to some abrupt behavior when traversing bumps or making sudden left/right transitions. Maybe OK in a pure racecar where you will tune the suspension for a particular track or weekend, as long as the driver is aware of it, and prepared to compensate.

    Carter

  • 93EXCivic

    Oct. 11, 2011 4:55 p.m. 93EXCivic SuperDork

    So the car has been stalled getting the Supra for the Challenge. I am about to order the door sills for the car. And I just picked up the JK Jackson 1500 with Weber DCOEs that was in the old GRM Spitfire.

  • Rusted_Busted_Spit

    Oct. 12, 2011 10:25 a.m. Rusted_Busted_Spit SuperDork

    This is making me want to dig my Spit out of the garage and start on it. Mine is a white 64 also bu tI have owned it since 89, man that is a long time.

  • Gasoline

    Oct. 12, 2011 11:18 a.m. Gasoline New Reader

    In reply to 93EXCivic:

    I used to know of a GT6 in a old junkyard in Cedartown, GA that is probably still there....

  • 93EXCivic

    April 23, 2012 10:28 a.m. 93EXCivic UltimaDork

    I started pulling apart the front end this past weekend.

    I know the steering mounting isn't stock but is it in the stock location?

    Also did this a while ago but made new tow hooks for the front since they were bent.

  • motomoron

    April 23, 2012 2:35 p.m. motomoron Dork

    When you do the inner-outer rockers: get the doors to fit right, body on the chassis, very well supported at at least 5 points. Remove doors and either weld in a couple spreader bars in each door opening or bolt small pieces of plate in the jambs and weld the spreaders to those.

    You NEED to maintain the hinge-striker orientation and distance while you're cutting the old sills out and installing the new ones.

    Fit the new parts carefully, imparting as little force as possible to get the parts to hold alignment. Once everything fits, tack the inner rockers in then the outers.

    Just use enough carefully considered tacks to hold everything aligned, then do the other side of the car

    Then put tacks between the tacks, then connect short beads of weld - in other words, don't start seam welding at one end of the car and aim for the other end - you'll end up w/ a banana shaped car.

    It's a slow process welding your way all over the whole assemblies 'til it's done, but when you're done and you remove the door aperture spreader and upon reinstallation the doors still fit - it's worth the effort.

    And yes, I've done it both ways. This IS easier and faster all-in.

  • irish44j

    April 23, 2012 4:51 p.m. irish44j SuperDork

    this looks familiar , lol.

    anyhow, I did a fairly basic-ish rebuild of a GT6 a few years ago and have a pretty long build thread on it, in case you want to check it out for ideas, etc. I have some old GT6 stuff sitting around too (some glass, doors, suspension parts, etc) in case you need anything. Hit me up.

    http://club.triumph.org.uk/cgi-bin/forum10/Blah.pl?m-1206842587/

    josh

« 1 2 »  
Tire Rack- Revolutionizing Tire Buying

You'll need to log in to post.