How long until guys using terms like "NA$CRAP" realize that telling the same joke 7,000 times makes it a lot less funny each time?
-
Nov. 5, 2009 5:17 p.m. Will Reader
-
Nov. 5, 2009 6:45 p.m. kreb Dork
You know what? If Infineon had a NASCAR track, and I had the choice of watching those cars on the roundy-round versus staying in one spot on the the road course...... I might take the oval track. Why? because from a strictly spectator perspective I can see most all of the race as it happens, rather than seeing guys for 10 seconds of each 90. As a participant, give me a road course any day. But as a spectator sport, I entirely understand why NASCAR is more popular. Wasting one's breath hating on the other guys is trully silly.
-
Nov. 5, 2009 7:10 p.m. Will Reader
kreb wrote:
You know what? If Infineon had a NASCAR track
Not sure if serious...
-
Nov. 5, 2009 8:46 p.m. Xceler8x Dork
Will wrote:
How long until guys using terms like "NA$CRAP" realize that telling the same joke 7,000 times makes it a lot less funny each time?
So a horse walks into a bar....
-
Nov. 5, 2009 8:57 p.m. 96DXCivic HalfDork
Giant Purple Snorklewacker wrote:
MadScientistMatt wrote:
I'm surprised nobody has yet mentioned the trouble of making an IRS work correctly on a 30 degree superspeedway banked turn. An IRS set up for good camber gain in compression on a flat track would have some issues when the downforce shifts around as much as it does on a superspeedway.
As long as the road is smooth and the additional unsprung weight of the diff is not of concern to the chassis design then there are some real advantages to a live axle when it comes time to get on the power exiting a turn. You can get over 100% anti-squat out of it and only maybe 25% from IRS - not to mention that if you only turn one direction they are easy to set up with offset.
EDIT: in bold
I am pretty sure you can get more then 25% anti-squat out of an IRS.
-
Nov. 5, 2009 8:57 p.m. DukeOfUndersteer Dork
wearing a Richard Petty shirt...
-
Nov. 5, 2009 9:44 p.m. JeepinMatt Reader
I just want to say that it isn't technology or money that makes good racing. I'd think I'd hear "obviously" a hundred times, but I have to stop and think every time "the technology" is brought up as a reason why a certain series is inferior.
