Marjorie Suddard wrote:And no car at the end of the loan. Either way, it's far from free. At least what we'd consider free! (Sorry, we're still in a world where $500 a month is a lot to pay to drive a car.) And in our world, where let's face it, most cars ARE free, it'd better earn its keep for the money we're paying. So if Tim's biased in any way on this car, it's not because he sold his soul to BMW--it's because he has to keep the squirrels in his head from chattering about what it's costing him. Like most car owners.
Margie
I understand what you are saying, and $500 a month is a lot of money for me also. But for me it's not really about the money, but what the money represents. I guess what I'm trying to say, and this is my opinion only, is there is a very significant difference between buying a car and using a car. When I buy a NEW car, I've already done my research and evaluataion of that car. So by purchasing it, I'm making a commitment to it and a statement that I think that car was better than others in the same catagory. When you test a car, to a large extent you are trying to determine (admittedly in a lot more depth) what you already know about a car you buy. I know it's not that black and white, but hopefully you get the idea. In my mind, that difference is likely to show in your review of that car, so it would seem best to disclose that in the very beginning. When Tim said he purchased the BMW, it said to me that he thinks very highly of that car. That may or may not be. But in reality he didn't buy it, but is using it over a two year period to evaluate if he will think highly of it, and add parts to improve it. Both are fine, but in my opinion, different.
