Salanis wrote:
SVreX wrote:
Oddsmakers: If there is no God, the consequences of my being wrong are rather insignificant. Of course, if there IS a God...
There was a famous mathematician during the middle ages or renaissance who decided to become Christian based on that idea. That statistically speaking, infinite reward or infinite punishment, even on the slimmest possibility still makes an infinite argument.
However, his formula was based on only one possibility for a god.
I had a friend who, using the same formula, determined it was wisest to be agnostic. God's have historically been shown to get more pissed at people who worshiped the wrong god, than at people who did not worship any god. Therefore, given the broad range of pantheons, the smartest thing you can do, is to offend the fewest number of gods.
My problem with this is summed up in one word: Choice. You cannot choose what you believe. If I could choose to believe that God is real, I would. I can certainly SAY that I believe in God - I could just tell everybody that I meet about the "Good News", but that does not mean that I actually believe in God.
If you don't follow my logic here, try it with Santa. Believe in Santa. Right now. Do it. You say to me "Well, I don't believe in Santa because he's not real." OK, but Believe in him anyway. Choose to believe in Santa. But actually believe he's real - you cannot trick your own mind - don't tell me you do if you don't, but actually believe in him. See? Children believe in him because they don't see any reason why he's not real. As soon as they find out he's imaginary BAM! that's it. No more believing.