Apexcarver wrote:
he made some real wadcutter rounds. they are pure cylinder with a hollow point-end (not a point, but a flat face with a huge dish). I dont want to think about what one would do to someone breaking in, but they are what is in the home defense lockboxes (2 houses)
come to think of it... is there some legal grounds that i would want to change out to regular bullets for home defense? could i get a cruel and unusual for super wadcutter hollowpoints?
Osterkraut is neither lawyer nor self-defense expert, just a guy who once asked similar questions
Two things:
Purely from a CYA standpoint, I'd never use handloads in self-defense. In these days when you're advised against using Black Talons because of their evil reputation, if you were forced to go to court it could be spun that you were a loose cannon looking to shoot someone.
From a standpoint as a round, that round is far, far inferior to a modern jacketed hollow point (JHP). Given the .38 Specials rather...maligned reputation as a man-stopper, I'd load it with the best I can get my hands on. If your revolver is built for it (ie: full-sized, 4"+ barrel), run Cor-Bon's +P JHP. Probably a little less than 130-grain. Shorter barrel, heavier grain (mostly). Weaker/smaller gun? Similar designs minus the +P.
Can't go wrong with Cor-Bon. My .40 S&W runs their 135 grain JHP. That said, any of the modern, non-gimmick choices from the big brands (Cor-Bon, Federal, Winchester, Remington, Hornady, CCI, Norma, etc) will probably do the trick.