Login Register Sign up for the GRM e-newsletter

Login to post Forums » Off-topic discussion » Apparently the warming wasn't quite "global" « 1 2 »
  • Jerry From LA

    June 2, 2010 11:49 a.m. Jerry From LA HalfDork

    1988RedT2 wrote:

    What's amazing is that Al Gore invented the internet!

    Actually he did as much as anyone. Both he and his wife have no ability to relate to anyone else but themselves. It's amazing he got as far as he did without that ability. I'm thinking this separation will prove to be short-lived. Tipper wants her old man to be a little more available and slow down the schedule. It's not like they don't have enough money. Besides, they just bought a house in Montecito. No one is going anywhere.

  • Jerry From LA

    June 2, 2010 11:51 a.m. Jerry From LA HalfDork

    jlm_photo wrote:

    Guess I posted my opinion on the wrong side of the forums...but Al Gore is guilty of doing more damage to the enviroment than anyone.

    No more than Rupert Murdoch or any other rich puke. Matter of fact, I'll bet the house Murdoch does ten times more damage than Gore. What we need here is one of those USA Today pie charts showing the relative ecological damage done by all rich pukes and the companies they own.

  • jlm_photo

    June 2, 2010 12:03 p.m. jlm_photo New Reader

    How come everyone who is "rich" is a "puke"? Is it horrible to be "rich" or want to have money?

  • Jerry From LA

    June 2, 2010 12:06 p.m. Jerry From LA HalfDork

    jlm_photo wrote:

    How come everyone who is "rich" is a "puke"? Is it horrible to be "rich" or want to have money?

    Nope. I'm just talking about the pukey rich.

  • Jensenman

    June 2, 2010 12:21 p.m. Jensenman SuperDork

    Nothing wrong with wanting to get ahead and make a few bucks. Where it becomes not necessarily wrong but maybe not so good is when it becomes wasteful.

    I know everyone has a different view of 'wasteful', but an example of true waste: there's a spit of land south of Kiawah Island known as Cap'n Sam's Spit. It's a barrier island which has ebbed and flowed over the years; for that reason it can't be covered under the coastal flood insurance program (federally subsidized flood insurance). A group has gotten together and bought the land for next to nothing. Now they want the federal government to grant an exemption so they can build multimillion dollar houses on the property. By their own figures, 25 years would be stretching it, the houses would probably be wiped out in a hurricane sooner than that.

    http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/no-taxpayer-subsidies-for-capn-sams-land

    Now that is wasteful.

  • Jerry From LA

    June 2, 2010 12:28 p.m. Jerry From LA HalfDork

    ^ +1 bro.

  • oldsaw

    June 2, 2010 12:47 p.m. oldsaw Dork

    Apparently, losing the 2000 election was a catalyst (that took 10yrs) that led to a failed marriage:

    http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2010/06/01/cbs_evening_news_gores_loss_to_b...

    I'm calling BS as many things have passed since TeamGore vacated the VP's residence..........

  • Jerry From LA

    June 2, 2010 1:54 p.m. Jerry From LA HalfDork

    I'm still thinking they'll reconcile eventually, especially when ol' Al realizes he'll keep more money by staying home than he can make traveling the world.

    Regarding the 2000 election: The Gores ran a poor campaign. It shouldn't have been that close in the first place. Whatever happened in FL shouldn't have made a difference. So Al and Tipper have no one to blame but themselves. That election was theirs for the taking and they lost it.

  • oldsaw

    June 2, 2010 2:19 p.m. oldsaw Dork

    Jerry From LA wrote:

    Regarding the 2000 election: The Gores ran a poor campaign. It shouldn't have been that close in the first place. Whatever happened in FL shouldn't have made a difference. So Al and Tipper have no one to blame but themselves. That election was theirs for the taking and they lost it.

    100% agreed!

    Neither TeamGore nor their sycophants have owned-up to the campaign collapse; instead they chose to blame the SCOTUS and Bush43.

    Regardless of Bush's short-comings, I firmly believe the opposition's refusal to recognize and admit their personal failures are key to a decade (plus) of political acrimony the country should never have endured - if responsible adults were at the helm, that is.

  • racerdave600

    June 2, 2010 2:33 p.m. racerdave600 Reader

    Jerry From LA wrote:

    jlm_photo wrote:

    Guess I posted my opinion on the wrong side of the forums...but Al Gore is guilty of doing more damage to the enviroment than anyone.

    No more than Rupert Murdoch or any other rich puke. Matter of fact, I'll bet the house Murdoch does ten times more damage than Gore. What we need here is one of those USA Today pie charts showing the relative ecological damage done by all rich pukes and the companies they own.

    Don't remember where I saw it, but I did catch an article comparing Gore's "carbon footprint" to that of Bush since he left office. Gore's was multiple times higher. It was Bush that had all of the eco stuff on his house, compared to zip for Gore.

  • June 2, 2010 5:42 p.m. z31maniac Dork

    Jerry From LA wrote:

    jlm_photo wrote:

    Guess I posted my opinion on the wrong side of the forums...but Al Gore is guilty of doing more damage to the enviroment than anyone.

    No more than Rupert Murdoch or any other rich puke. Matter of fact, I'll bet the house Murdoch does ten times more damage than Gore. What we need here is one of those USA Today pie charts showing the relative ecological damage done by all rich pukes and the companies they own.

    I don't pay attention to Murdoch, but he is part of the visible campaign to cripple our economy with taxes and say we all need to be careful of our resource use?

    All the while having a home that spends more on utilities in two months than the average American makes in a year?

  • rainydave

    June 2, 2010 6:45 p.m. rainydave New Reader

    Interesting

    http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/240224/george_w_bush_vs_al_gore_who_has_t...

  • aeronca65t

    June 3, 2010 8:35 a.m. aeronca65t HalfDork

    Duke wrote:

    aeronca65t wrote:

    A pity.

    I thought he was OK.....not perfect, but a FAR better choice in 2000. And I really liked her. As a parent, I thought her initiatives against strong language on videos was good and pretty balanced.

    I believe you're the first person I've ever seen who thought that Tipper Gore was anything other than a sanctimonious idiot.

    Why thank you so much for your opinion.

    I disagree with you.

  • aeronca65t

    June 3, 2010 8:41 a.m. aeronca65t HalfDork

    oldsaw wrote:

    Regardless of Bush's short-comings, I firmly believe the opposition's refusal to recognize and admit their personal failures are key to a decade (plus) of political acrimony the country should never have endured - if responsible adults were at the helm, that is.

    You mean all the problems of the Bush years were Gore's fault?

    I agree that Gore's campaign was poorly run......he should have had Bill and Hillary on-board. He needed to look passed the personal dislike and been more of a politician. But he couldn't. As usual, Will Rogers was right.

  • oldsaw

    June 3, 2010 9:46 a.m. oldsaw Dork

    aeronca65t wrote:

    oldsaw wrote:

    Regardless of Bush's short-comings, I firmly believe the opposition's refusal to recognize and admit their personal failures are key to a decade (plus) of political acrimony the country should never have endured - if responsible adults were at the helm, that is.

    You mean all the problems of the Bush years were Gore's fault?

    I agree that Gore's campaign was poorly run......he should have had Bill and Hillary on-board. He needed to look passed the personal dislike and been more of a politician. But he couldn't. As usual, Will Rogers was right.

    I didn't and don't give Bush a pass.

    However, I readily contend that post-2000, partisan politics were worse and more divisive than those experienced during Clinton's tenure. But, if had Bill owned-up to his dalliances, the country would have been in a much better mood and Gore's chances to gain the Presidency would have vastly improved.

    Instead, we got a sore loser beatchin' about that "other guy" for a decade, backed by a party doing it's best to smear the opposition while being as guilty and duplicitous as everything in its' crosshairs.

    As far as Al and Tipper's marriage, I hate to see any long-term relationship fail, but they will probably do less damage apart than they might together.

  • June 3, 2010 12:24 p.m. kcmoken New Reader

    In reply to racerdave600:

    http://www.snopes.com/politics/bush/house.asp

  • poopshovel

    June 3, 2010 1:45 p.m. poopshovel SuperDork

    Tom Heath wrote:

    I have a special place in my heart for Tipper. It's right behind the stack of Dead Kennedys records.

    Jello v. Tipper, from the wayback machine.

    I had zero interest looking at this thread. Now I'm glad I did. Jello Biafra in a suit. HA! What a miserable piece of facist garbage Tipper Gore was.

  • Duke

    June 4, 2010 7:39 a.m. Duke SuperDork

    aeronca65t wrote:

    Duke wrote:

    aeronca65t wrote:

    A pity.

    I thought he was OK.....not perfect, but a FAR better choice in 2000. And I really liked her. As a parent, I thought her initiatives against strong language on videos was good and pretty balanced.

    I believe you're the first person I've ever seen who thought that Tipper Gore was anything other than a sanctimonious idiot.

    Why thank you so much for your opinion.

    I disagree with you.

    I assume we run with different crowds.

  • DoctorBlade

    June 4, 2010 11:15 a.m. DoctorBlade Reader

    At least the kids won't be affected.

    As for his politics vs hers... I thought it was silly she got quiet about her moral outrage when he became VP.

« 1 2 »  
Tire Rack- Revolutionizing Tire Buying

You'll need to log in to post.