Redhornet wrote:
"We have a lock-down situation,..."
A lock-down situation? Really. It's only 110 students, how many of them are likely to get into some trouble no one knows about? Also, aren't these kids in different classes/subjects, it's not like all or even half of them are in one class together at the same time.
"...we have cameras, but the question we had to answer is, 'What if somebody gets in? What are we going to do?"
Who?!?! Who the berkeley is going to "get in" and what the berkeley do you think they would do, in some podunk, nowhere texas town?!?! If there's only 110 students, there's what, maybe 1000 people total in that town? Who the berkeley is going to break into a school in the middle of the day and what could there possibly be in that school anyone would want?!?!
"It's just common sense."
Oh, that's what it is, right, gotcha, common sense. You're right, it's absolutely neccessary we let teachers arm themselves and take over security responsibilities too, just in case. Until, of course, said armed teacher misinterperates some innocuous action from a child or other person, pulls out the weapon, shoots and kills/wounds said child/person, then anyone within a 10 mile radius is getting sued and the whole thing winds up back in the Supreme Court.
Now I'm all for firearm ownership by the citizens of this country. But letting our teachers carry weapons is a complete affront to the teaching profession. Teachers and the education system as a whole, need to focus on doing their primary responsibility, teaching. And I don't want to hear any "...if classrooms aren't secure then teachers can't to their job..." bs. If a school is so dangerous that people are worried about shootings, then arming the teachers isn't going to solve the problem, period.
So what about the shooting in the last couple of years in that podunk school in Pennsylvania?