the problem with what you just said is its expanding the role of school from educator to social wellbeing provider and monitor.
We already have had a problem since the 90s with teachers telling parents their kids need ritalin. Lol, medical degree wut?
But to answer your first point, yes, I indicte the federal educational system as a whole. Both for being a bad idea in the first place wrought with politics more and substance less, and also for overstepping its bounds and losing focus too easily.
People educated by this system are alot more susceptible in my view to politicians as a whole, weaker on critical thinking, and generally less capable of fighting off the scenario you put forward in your :28 post.
But the problem I have with how people respond to this situation is to give the eduational department more money and more power.
We spend more per child than pretty much any nation that I can think of, and we get our asses handed to us in testing and scholastics by nations spending fractions of the money.
We shouldn't be giving the federal government more power where it has failed us from the beginning. Thats rewarding bad behavior, something I thought we agreed isn't something we should do.
And the home life, while important, is immaterial to this discussion as it is largely a cultural problem, not a problem of the educational system. If people see it that way, then they're yet again giving more power to the federal government where it has none; power to dictate instances based on things outside of the educational system.