Login Register Sign up for the GRM e-newsletter

Login to post Forums » Off-topic discussion » In case you cared what Michael Moore thinks... « 1 2 3 »
  • aircooled

    June 2, 2009 12:46 p.m. aircooled SuperDork

    http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/message/index.php?id=248


    Monday, June 1st, 2009 Goodbye, GM ...by Michael Moore

    I write this on the morning of the end of the once-mighty General Motors. By high noon, the President of the United States will have made it official: General Motors, as we know it, has been totaled.

    As I sit here in GM's birthplace, Flint, Michigan, I am surrounded by friends and family who are filled with anxiety about what will happen to them and to the town. Forty percent of the homes and businesses in the city have been abandoned. Imagine what it would be like if you lived in a city where almost every other house is empty. What would be your state of mind?

    It is with sad irony that the company which invented "planned obsolescence" -- the decision to build cars that would fall apart after a few years so that the customer would then have to buy a new one -- has now made itself obsolete. It refused to build automobiles that the public wanted, cars that got great gas mileage, were as safe as they could be, and were exceedingly comfortable to drive. Oh -- and that wouldn't start falling apart after two years. GM stubbornly fought environmental and safety regulations. Its executives arrogantly ignored the "inferior" Japanese and German cars, cars which would become the gold standard for automobile buyers. And it was hell-bent on punishing its unionized workforce, lopping off thousands of workers for no good reason other than to "improve" the short-term bottom line of the corporation. Beginning in the 1980s, when GM was posting record profits, it moved countless jobs to Mexico and elsewhere, thus destroying the lives of tens of thousands of hard-working Americans. The glaring stupidity of this policy was that, when they eliminated the income of so many middle class families, who did they think was going to be able to afford to buy their cars? History will record this blunder in the same way it now writes about the French building the Maginot Line or how the Romans cluelessly poisoned their own water system with lethal lead in its pipes.

    So here we are at the deathbed of General Motors. The company's body not yet cold, and I find myself filled with -- dare I say it -- joy. It is not the joy of revenge against a corporation that ruined my hometown and brought misery, divorce, alcoholism, homelessness, physical and mental debilitation, and drug addiction to the people I grew up with. Nor do I, obviously, claim any joy in knowing that 21,000 more GM workers will be told that they, too, are without a job.

    But you and I and the rest of America now own a car company! I know, I know -- who on earth wants to run a car company? Who among us wants $50 billion of our tax dollars thrown down the rat hole of still trying to save GM? Let's be clear about this: The only way to save GM is to kill GM. Saving our precious industrial infrastructure, though, is another matter and must be a top priority. If we allow the shutting down and tearing down of our auto plants, we will sorely wish we still had them when we realize that those factories could have built the alternative energy systems we now desperately need. And when we realize that the best way to transport ourselves is on light rail and bullet trains and cleaner buses, how will we do this if we've allowed our industrial capacity and its skilled workforce to disappear?

    Thus, as GM is "reorganized" by the federal government and the bankruptcy court, here is the plan I am asking President Obama to implement for the good of the workers, the GM communities, and the nation as a whole. Twenty years ago when I made "Roger & Me," I tried to warn people about what was ahead for General Motors. Had the power structure and the punditocracy listened, maybe much of this could have been avoided. Based on my track record, I request an honest and sincere consideration of the following suggestions:

    1. Just as President Roosevelt did after the attack on Pearl Harbor, the President must tell the nation that we are at war and we must immediately convert our auto factories to factories that build mass transit vehicles and alternative energy devices. Within months in Flint in 1942, GM halted all car production and immediately used the assembly lines to build planes, tanks and machine guns. The conversion took no time at all. Everyone pitched in. The fascists were defeated.

    We are now in a different kind of war -- a war that we have conducted against the ecosystem and has been conducted by our very own corporate leaders. This current war has two fronts. One is headquartered in Detroit. The products built in the factories of GM, Ford and Chrysler are some of the greatest weapons of mass destruction responsible for global warming and the melting of our polar icecaps. The things we call "cars" may have been fun to drive, but they are like a million daggers into the heart of Mother Nature. To continue to build them would only lead to the ruin of our species and much of the planet.

    The other front in this war is being waged by the oil companies against you and me. They are committed to fleecing us whenever they can, and they have been reckless stewards of the finite amount of oil that is located under the surface of the earth. They know they are sucking it bone dry. And like the lumber tycoons of the early 20th century who didn't give a damn about future generations as they tore down every forest they could get their hands on, these oil barons are not telling the public what they know to be true -- that there are only a few more decades of useable oil on this planet. And as the end days of oil approach us, get ready for some very desperate people willing to kill and be killed just to get their hands on a gallon can of gasoline.

    President Obama, now that he has taken control of GM, needs to convert the factories to new and needed uses immediately.

    1. Don't put another $30 billion into the coffers of GM to build cars. Instead, use that money to keep the current workforce -- and most of those who have been laid off -- employed so that they can build the new modes of 21st century transportation. Let them start the conversion work now.

    2. Announce that we will have bullet trains criss-crossing this country in the next five years. Japan is celebrating the 45th anniversary of its first bullet train this year. Now they have dozens of them. Average speed: 165 mph. Average time a train is late: under 30 seconds. They have had these high speed trains for nearly five decades -- and we don't even have one! The fact that the technology already exists for us to go from New York to L.A. in 17 hours by train, and that we haven't used it, is criminal. Let's hire the unemployed to build the new high speed lines all over the country. Chicago to Detroit in less than two hours. Miami to DC in under 7 hours. Denver to Dallas in five and a half. This can be done and done now.

    3. Initiate a program to put light rail mass transit lines in all our large and medium-sized cities. Build those trains in the GM factories. And hire local people everywhere to install and run this system.

    4. For people in rural areas not served by the train lines, have the GM plants produce energy efficient clean buses.

    5. For the time being, have some factories build hybrid or all-electric cars (and batteries). It will take a few years for people to get used to the new ways to transport ourselves, so if we're going to have automobiles, let's have kinder, gentler ones. We can be building these next month (do not believe anyone who tells you it will take years to retool the factories -- that simply isn't true).

    6. Transform some of the empty GM factories to facilities that build windmills, solar panels and other means of alternate forms of energy. We need tens of millions of solar panels right now. And there is an eager and skilled workforce who can build them.

    7. Provide tax incentives for those who travel by hybrid car or bus or train. Also, credits for those who convert their home to alternative energy.

    8. To help pay for this, impose a two-dollar tax on every gallon of gasoline. This will get people to switch to more energy saving cars or to use the new rail lines and rail cars the former autoworkers have built for them.

    Well, that's a start. Please, please, please don't save GM so that a smaller version of it will simply do nothing more than build Chevys or Cadillacs. This is not a long-term solution. Don't throw bad money into a company whose tailpipe is malfunctioning, causing a strange odor to fill the car.

    100 years ago this year, the founders of General Motors convinced the world to give up their horses and saddles and buggy whips to try a new form of transportation. Now it is time for us to say goodbye to the internal combustion engine. It seemed to serve us well for so long. We enjoyed the car hops at the A&W. We made out in the front -- and the back -- seat. We watched movies on large outdoor screens, went to the races at NASCAR tracks across the country, and saw the Pacific Ocean for the first time through the window down Hwy. 1. And now it's over. It's a new day and a new century. The President -- and the UAW -- must seize this moment and create a big batch of lemonade from this very sour and sad lemon.

    Yesterday, the last surviving person from the Titanic disaster passed away. She escaped certain death that night and went on to live another 97 years.

    So can we survive our own Titanic in all the Flint Michigans of this country. 60% of GM is ours. I think we can do a better job.

    Yours, Michael Moore

  • aircooled

    June 2, 2009 12:49 p.m. aircooled SuperDork

    Can't say I completely disagree with him (the idea of doing some re-purposing), but I do think he is being a bit naive in a few spots. People wanted small economical cars? Why the hell did they buy all those Explorers then!?

  • stuart in mn

    June 2, 2009 12:52 p.m. stuart in mn Dork

    I wonder how often he personally takes the bus to work.

  • EricM

    June 2, 2009 1:04 p.m. EricM HalfDork

    Well I ride my bike to work.

    I do, however, like to take my family in the minivan...

    I don;t know if that fits in anywhere.....

    shurgs pops some popcorn and will ride out the next decade observing.

  • WilD

    June 2, 2009 1:21 p.m. WilD Reader

    Anyone else tired of all the blowhards blaming the fall of GM on the product? The problem wasn't the cars... GM still sold a comparatively large number of automobiles...

  • Cotton

    June 2, 2009 1:31 p.m. Cotton Reader

    WilD wrote:

    Anyone else tired of all the blowhards blaming the fall of GM on the product? The problem wasn't the cars... GM still sold a comparatively large number of automobiles...

    yeah it's been getting old for awhile now.

  • mad_machine

    June 2, 2009 1:45 p.m. mad_machine UltraDork

    2 dollar a tax on gas.. not a bad idea IF we had all that mass transit he talks about. To put it into use before hand would kill this country.

    The high prices of gas last summer were the final nails in the coffin of our economy as we know it.

    Also.. what about:

    Provide tax incentives for those who travel by hybrid car or bus or train. Also, credits for those who convert their home to alternative energy.

    I ride my bicycle a lot to and from some jobs.. does it get more alternative energy than that? I would like a tax break for each mile I put under the pedals of my mountainbike

  • wherethefmi

    June 2, 2009 1:45 p.m. wherethefmi HalfDork

    what a blow hard, what about 5 years from now when those batteries need to be disposed of. and light rail and busses are actually less energy/cost effective than say a small diesel car. berklying idiot.

  • Tom_Spangler

    June 2, 2009 2:31 p.m. Tom_Spangler New Reader

    aircooled wrote:

    People wanted small economical cars? Why the hell did they buy all those Explorers then!?

    And why did Toyota build a brand new factory in Texas to build full-size pickups just a couple of years ago? Oh, that's right, only American companies build evil vehicles.

    Moore is so blinded by his own agenda he hasn't been able to see the facts for years. It was true when he made "Roger and Me" 20 years ago, and it's even more true now.

    I could go on and on about this guy, but I'll restrain myself.....

  • 4cylndrfury

    June 2, 2009 2:40 p.m. 4cylndrfury HalfDork

    moore = the top 80% of:

  • Xceler8x

    June 2, 2009 2:44 p.m. Xceler8x Dork

    I like his idea of high speed rail. Only because the TSA makes airline travel a completely pain in the ass for anyone who isn't royalty or an elected policitician/CEO, but I repeat myself.

    So far as cars go...his pie in the sky idea of buses for everyone won't come to pass. Anyone who can afford on demand, low cost, reliable transportation will own it. No matter what mass transit is available. Can you imagine using a bus to go grocery shopping? You can do it but forget about getting a week's worth of food at one time and hauling it home.

  • ignorant

    June 2, 2009 3:21 p.m. ignorant PowerDork

    WilD wrote:

    Anyone else tired of all the blowhards blaming the fall of GM on the product? The problem wasn't the cars... GM still sold a comparatively large number of automobiles...

    OK.. Then tell me why..

    It's always about the product.

    the positioning of the product

    the production of the product

    the placement of the product.

    Its about the product... ALWAYS about the product.

  • June 2, 2009 3:26 p.m. captain_napalm New Reader

    Xceler8x wrote:

    Can you imagine using a bus to go grocery shopping? You can do it but forget about getting a week's worth of food at one time and hauling it home.

    Not to mention it's not really feasible in our more rural areas.

  • June 2, 2009 3:29 p.m. captain_napalm New Reader

    Xceler8x wrote:

    I like his idea of high speed rail.

    Also, I like this idea, but it really isn't feasible. I'd take Amtrak more if it weren't for the fact that their scheduling is wonky, and it's more expensive and is longer than taking the bus.

  • Cotton

    June 2, 2009 3:41 p.m. Cotton Reader

    This is off Jalopnik today:

    Honda saw sales decline 39.2% from record-setting May 2008 results. Ford outsold Toyota (down 40.2%) for yet another month. GM sales were down a better-than-expected 29.6% and they sold twice as many Camaros in May as Honda sold Insight hybrids.

  • ignorant

    June 2, 2009 3:48 p.m. ignorant PowerDork

    Cotton wrote:

    This is off Jalopnik today:

    Honda saw sales decline 39.2% from record-setting May 2008 results. Ford outsold Toyota (down 40.2%) for yet another month. GM sales were down a better-than-expected 29.6% and they sold twice as many Camaros in May as Honda sold Insight hybrids.

    They aren't making any margin on the stuff that is selling.

    Placement and positioning of the products are incorrect.

  • Osterkraut

    June 2, 2009 3:54 p.m. Osterkraut Dork

    ignorant wrote:

    WilD wrote:

    Anyone else tired of all the blowhards blaming the fall of GM on the product? The problem wasn't the cars... GM still sold a comparatively large number of automobiles...

    OK.. Then tell me why..

    It's always about the product.

    the positioning of the product

    the production of the product

    the placement of the product.

    Its about the product... ALWAYS about the product.

    Unless you're Toyota, which has been resting on it's laurels for awhile now.

  • Mental

    June 2, 2009 3:56 p.m. Mental UberDork

    Diesel Motorcycles

  • June 2, 2009 4:32 p.m. captain_napalm New Reader

    Osterkraut wrote:

    ignorant wrote:

    WilD wrote:

    Anyone else tired of all the blowhards blaming the fall of GM on the product? The problem wasn't the cars... GM still sold a comparatively large number of automobiles...

    OK.. Then tell me why..

    It's always about the product.

    the positioning of the product

    the production of the product

    the placement of the product.

    Its about the product... ALWAYS about the product.

    Unless you're Toyota, which has been resting on it's laurels for awhile now.

    That's one other thing. Right or wrong, there's the whole reputation thing. Toyota and Honda are perceived to be more reliable than their domestic counterparts.

  • ignorant

    June 2, 2009 4:47 p.m. ignorant PowerDork

    Osterkraut wrote: Unless you're Toyota, which has been resting on it's laurels for awhile now.

    Incorrect. They're positioning is better than GM's..

  • ddavidv

    June 2, 2009 4:53 p.m. ddavidv UltraDork

    While I agree with blubberbutt...err, Moore that we need to get the mainstream populace off internal combustion fuel vehicles, he has no clue what the hell he is talking about when it comes to rail or much of anything else. He's too busy chugging the far left Kool-Aid to ever crack open a book and learn something about what he's spewing.

    We dismantled one of the best rail systems in the world in this country beginning prior to WW II and kicked the rest to the curb in the 1960s. Every town of note had a train station and rail service, and rural areas were often served by trolleys. If you want my scholarly explanation of how this came to pass, I can try to write something. The end result, however, is this: we've removed and abandoned so much trackage, and since built over the right-of-ways that to try to rebuild such an infrastructure is basically impossible, both from a practical and financial standpoint.

    Moore also conveniently glosses over the fact that NO rail passenger service in the world (that I'm aware of anyway) is profitable. They are all subsidized by the government in whatever country the operate.

    Americans love their personal mobility and will never give it up for mass transit. That's a liberal utopian pipe dream. What really needs to be done is get us off foreign oil (and plug in electrics aren't the answer). Moore lives in a fantasy land.

  • RX Reven'

    June 2, 2009 4:56 p.m. RX Reven' Reader

    I don’t want to take the bus…I want to come and go on my own schedule…I want to arrive at my exact destination on my first attempt rather than arriving at a rough approximation of my destination after several transfers…I want the privacy, convenience, safety, & cleanness that only comes with controlling my transportation environment.

    Michael is telling us that we only have two alternatives…take the bus or destroy the planet. Of course, he’s neither a scientist nor an engineer nor a community planner nor a venture capitalist and yet, he feels entitled to prognosticate our options.

  • ignorant

    June 2, 2009 5:00 p.m. ignorant PowerDork

    RX Reven' wrote:

    Michael is telling us that we only have two alternatives…take the bus or destroy the planet.

    You always have a third option, which is to drive yourself. However, You may be priced out of that soon.

  • Snowdoggie

    June 2, 2009 5:09 p.m. Snowdoggie Reader

    Xceler8x wrote:

    I like his idea of high speed rail. Only because the TSA makes airline travel a completely pain in the ass for anyone who isn't royalty or an elected policitician/CEO, but I repeat myself.

    I would like to see some nice fast bullet trains between Dallas, Austin and Houston, and there have been some proposals down here.

    Hey, if we can get T. Boone Pickens to invest in windmills....

  • wherethefmi

    June 2, 2009 6:04 p.m. wherethefmi HalfDork

    It also is a glaring omission on his part that ford is surviving and from what I remember the best selling car in the world was a Truck, F150 to be exact for a very long time. Moore makes me want to kick his ass and prove his point.

    I love how on his blog, letter there's no place to comment back

« 1 2 3 »  

You'll need to log in to post.