Some troll bait for you guys. 
-
Aug. 21, 2009 10:15 a.m. Xceler8x Dork
-
Aug. 21, 2009 10:48 a.m. z31maniac Dork
Now go look up how much taxes are going up hen the Bush tax cuts expire, I think my bracket jumps from 28% to 34%, or around $4k a year. About $333.33 a month, not an insignificant amount of money.
-
Aug. 21, 2009 11:30 a.m. aircooled SuperDork
I wonder if Hitler lowered taxes also? Probably let a tax cut made by Bismark expire too.
OK, OK, I know Bismark was in the late 1800's, but never let the facts get in the way of a perfectly good story.
-
Aug. 21, 2009 11:43 a.m. Bobzilla HalfDork
z31maniac wrote:
Now go look up how much taxes are going up hen the Bush tax cuts expire, I think my bracket jumps from 28% to 34%, or around $4k a year. About $333.33 a month, not an insignificant amount of money.
Don't go bringing in facts and reality. You know those and "Obama" don't go together.
-
Aug. 21, 2009 2:02 p.m. Xceler8x Dork
You guys are hilarious..
I couldn't pass this flounder by.
-
Aug. 21, 2009 3:50 p.m. aircooled SuperDork
That's because you are a Nazi, and Nazi's by nature are generally wacky.
Top Secret was a documentary!!!
-
Aug. 21, 2009 5:43 p.m. Toyman01 HalfDork
Ask me April 14 2010 if it did anything.
-
Aug. 21, 2009 10:09 p.m. oldsaw Reader
Toyman01 wrote:
Ask me April 14 2010 if it did anything.
November 3, 2010 wil be a more accurate barometer.
-
Aug. 21, 2009 10:24 p.m. Toyman01 HalfDork
oldsaw wrote:
Toyman01 wrote:
Ask me April 14 2010 if it did anything.
November 3, 2010 wil be a more accurate barometer.
Amen to that.
-
Aug. 22, 2009 9:26 a.m. carguy123 Dork
And he's cut income by 46%.
-
Aug. 22, 2009 10:09 a.m. 2002acr New Reader
carguy123 wrote:
And he's cut income by 46%.
Explain
-
Aug. 22, 2009 11:15 a.m. oldsaw Reader
2002acr wrote:
carguy123 wrote:
And he's cut income by 46%.
Explain
That's a reasonable request, 2002!
But, I'd rather have the President explain why the debt level increased another two trillion dollars (yesterday), while working with 18% lesser revenue.
http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE57K4XE20090821
-
Aug. 22, 2009 12:28 p.m. 2002acr New Reader
oldsaw wrote:
2002acr wrote:
carguy123 wrote:
And he's cut income by 46%.
Explain
That's a reasonable request, 2002!
But, I'd rather have the President explain why the debt level increased another two trillion dollars (yesterday), while working with 18% lesser revenue.
http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE57K4XE20090821
Me too. It helps that your post has a link attached.
-
Aug. 22, 2009 6:09 p.m. iceracer HalfDork
Fact is, the President cannot raise or lower taxes, only congress can do that. Maybe we should blame Pelosi. Also, the president is not responsible for the present economic conditions, he is just stuck with it. Again ,blame congress.
-
Aug. 23, 2009 4:20 p.m. SVreX SuperDork
I love this paragraph. While I understand it is not specifically referring to any actual plan, the inference of how politicians can abuse their definitions is astounding. Since when are "illegal immigrants" counted as "Americans"? How can a "non-working individual" get a tax cut? What moron would suggest that a seven year old kid had his taxes cut if his father's withholdings decrease?
Politicians are evil.
This is different than saying that 95+ percent of all Americans will receive a tax cut. Barack Obama sometimes confused his language about this on the campaign trail. He was wrong when he did so. Illegal immigrants, some non-working individuals and families, some retirees, etc. will not be assisted by any of the tax cuts. It’s also somewhat ambiguous whether, say, a 7-year-old kid is considered as having had his taxes cut if his daddy is having less withheld from his paycheck.
