Greg Voth wrote:In my experience (no offense to pigeon) on many claims the lawyers do not warrant the 33% fee they take.
In my experience (no offense to Greg) when the insurance company guy says you don't need a lawyer, you'd come out ahead if you had one.
I don't doubt that there are some cases where Greg's statement is true, but, as a general rule, those who are represented get substantially higher settlements than those who aren't. The difference is almost always more than enough to offset the attorney's fee.
