Not too far from me
1
2
-
Feb. 18, 2010 5:30 p.m. mad_machine PowerDork
-
Feb. 18, 2010 7:12 p.m. Giant Purple Snorklewacker SuperDork
I'm not sure but couldn't anyone on the other end be charged with viewing kiddie porn if a high school student were to be ohhh say rubbin' one out to iCarly pics on his laptop or something?
-
Feb. 18, 2010 7:13 p.m. mtn UltraDork
Giant Purple Snorklewacker wrote:
I'm not sure but couldn't anyone on the other end be charged with viewing kiddie porn if a high school student were to be ohhh say rubbin' one out to iCarly pics on his laptop or something?
Or um... maybe just changing, and the camera happens to be on?
-
Feb. 18, 2010 7:16 p.m. Giant Purple Snorklewacker SuperDork
mtn wrote:
Giant Purple Snorklewacker wrote:
I'm not sure but couldn't anyone on the other end be charged with viewing kiddie porn if a high school student were to be ohhh say rubbin' one out to iCarly pics on his laptop or something?
Or um... maybe just changing, and the camera happens to be on?
I was using some creative license... it draws a more colorful picture for the reader.
-
Feb. 18, 2010 8:15 p.m. Grtechguy UberDork
unbelievable. it's one thing if they are using them at the school (place of work,etc), but at the end users private residence?
heads are gonna roll
-
Feb. 18, 2010 8:27 p.m. MrJoshua UltraDork
A Nemo sticker is guarding my laptops camera.
Not that anyone cares what I do on my laptop, but Id rather have Nemo's eyes looking at me than a camera.
-
Feb. 18, 2010 8:29 p.m. ignorant UltimaDork
Grtechguy wrote:
unbelievable. it's one thing if they are using them at the school (place of work,etc), but at the end users private residence?
heads are gonna roll
depends on the terms of use agreement they signed...
Read what you sign....
-
Feb. 18, 2010 8:50 p.m. Grtechguy UberDork
ignorant wrote:
Grtechguy wrote:
unbelievable. it's one thing if they are using them at the school (place of work,etc), but at the end users private residence?
heads are gonna roll
depends on the terms of use agreement they signed...
Read what you sign....
and a student is under 18....thus MOST agreements are null and void as a minor is not legally liable to sign documents.
-
Feb. 18, 2010 9:14 p.m. Xceler8x Dork
Get'em use to having no privacy while they're young.
It's just that much easier to spy on them when they're adults. Welcome to the Brave New World comrades!
-
Feb. 18, 2010 10:53 p.m. oldsaw Dork
Grtechguy wrote:
ignorant wrote:
Grtechguy wrote:
unbelievable. it's one thing if they are using them at the school (place of work,etc), but at the end users private residence?
heads are gonna roll
depends on the terms of use agreement they signed...
Read what you sign....
and a student is under 18....thus MOST agreements are null and void as a minor is not legally liable to sign documents.
Re the bolded section:
Who signed the agreements, the parents or the students? Conventional wisdom suggests it was the parents. That said, the school system and its' insurer is going to pay big-time.
And a lot of families with school-issued laptops will disable cameras with strips of tape, or hammers.
-
Feb. 18, 2010 11:08 p.m. 96DXCivic HalfDork
I wouldn't have taken the laptop it is a Mac.
-
Feb. 18, 2010 11:13 p.m. xd New Reader
-
Feb. 19, 2010 9:17 a.m. EricM Dork
Pedo BEAR!!! good one.
-
Feb. 19, 2010 12:23 p.m. alex Dork
Update: "Yeah, we installed the spy cameras. But we weren't gonna do anything bad with 'em. And we already turned 'em off. Honest."
Also: what kind of rube lawyer lets the defendant send a letter to the plaintiffs after the lawsuit has been filed? Especially when that letter contains an admission of guilt?
-
Feb. 19, 2010 12:36 p.m. slefain Dork
Next headline:
"School system employee arrested after using remote webcam software to spy on high school cheerleaders at home..."
-
Feb. 19, 2010 1:24 p.m. rebelgtp Dork
slefain wrote:
Next headline:
"School system employee arrested after using remote webcam software to spy on high school cheerleaders at home..."
Hey they were just trying to get a little extra funding for the school. Do you have any idea how much a porn site featuring REAL high school cheerleaders would make?
After all they were only thinking of the children...
-
Feb. 19, 2010 1:28 p.m. oldsaw Dork
rebelgtp wrote:
slefain wrote:
Next headline:
"School system employee arrested after using remote webcam software to spy on high school cheerleaders at home..."
Hey they were just trying to get a little extra funding for the school. Do you have any idea how much a porn site featuring REAL high school cheerleaders would make?
After all they were only thinking of the children...
There is a prison-sentence's difference between "thinking of" and "thinking about" the children.
-
Feb. 19, 2010 3:12 p.m. alex Dork
Hey, I can think about 'em all I want. Don't take that away from me.
-
Feb. 19, 2010 3:59 p.m. slantvaliant HalfDork
Hmmm ... before we get into the possible child-porn aspect of this, I wonder which if any eavesdropping and stalking laws might apply?
-
Feb. 19, 2010 4:02 p.m. slantvaliant HalfDork
"The District never activated the security feature for any other purpose or in any other manner whatsoever"
Oh, yeah? Then how was this kid busted doing whatever it was he was doing?
-
Feb. 19, 2010 5:33 p.m. alex Dork
You'll just have to trust us. We're in charge.
At the very least, it seems wiretapping laws apply.
-
Feb. 19, 2010 6:24 p.m. stuart in mn SuperDork
I'm not saying they didn't do it, but is it possible that the kid took the picture himself and later on they found the file on his hard drive? That would still mean they were snooping on his computer, though.
-
Feb. 20, 2010 12:43 p.m. 92dxman Reader
As of yesterday, the district attorney's office is taking a close exam at things to see if there are any criminal matters involved since the wiretap act was potentially wronged. Also, the Fbi is investigating..
-
Feb. 22, 2010 5:08 p.m. alex Dork
Update: The family's lawyer says the student in question was disciplined for consuming what a school administrator thought were pills, but were in fact Mike & Ikes.
http://www.boingboing.net/2010/02/22/laptop-surveillance.html
-
Feb. 22, 2010 6:40 p.m. Appleseed Dork
I didn't know Mike & Ike's were a controlled substance.
