mndsm wrote:
...snip...Take the right to bare arms for example. Literally translated, (at least as I understand it) it means you have the right to possess and use a firearm.
...snip... if you are in danger of losing your life in the commitment of a crime-
just feeling a bit pissy tonight, but going without sleeves (bare arms) is not the same as possessing and using a firearm (bearing arms), and i'm pretty sure commission is the what you meant, rather than commitment.
sorry, i'm a spelling and grammar dork.
Mr. Meof (proper name Jack) scribbles a lot around here.
I see the McRoin brothers, Pat and Holden quite a bit here.
AngryCorvair wrote:
mndsm wrote:
...snip...Take the right to bare arms for example. Literally translated, (at least as I understand it) it means you have the right to possess and use a firearm.
...snip... if you are in danger of losing your life in the commitment of a crime-
just feeling a bit pissy tonight, but going without sleeves (bare arms) is not the same as possessing and using a firearm (bearing arms), and i'm pretty sure commission is the what you meant, rather than commitment.
sorry, i'm a spelling and grammar dork.
I support the right bear arms.. But the surgery is probably expensive.
ignorant wrote:
wcelliot wrote:
An unconscionable contract is one that no person who is mentally competent would enter into and that no fair and honest person would accept.
duh...
right.. what sane person would give away all their rights for a burger?
Like I said, superior MBA skills....
You're the only person I know who brags about an MBA.
AngryCorvair wrote:
mndsm wrote:
...snip...Take the right to bare arms for example. Literally translated, (at least as I understand it) it means you have the right to possess and use a firearm.
...snip... if you are in danger of losing your life in the commitment of a crime-
just feeling a bit pissy tonight, but going without sleeves (bare arms) is not the same as possessing and using a firearm (bearing arms), and i'm pretty sure commission is the what you meant, rather than commitment.
sorry, i'm a spelling and grammar dork.
And one funny mortar forker.
In N' Out puts olives on their burgers. For a Five Guys, yeah I'd sign as as my alter ego, Mr. Meof. Oh, wait... maybe that's NOT my alter ego. It might be the REAL one. 
I haven't read all the posts, but quite simply it was an unrealistic question that got the expected unrealistic answer.
triumph5 wrote:
I haven't read all the posts, but quite simply it was an unrealistic question that got the expected unrealistic answer.
No! It's a matter of absolute importance that has serious implications for the future of humanity! This is all very serious! You're making light of a massively significant... hey, that looks like a good burger.
I'm an In N Out guy, but we went to five guys again tonight. No In N Out here in Denver. Five Guys is damn good, I have to admit.
Off topic? Well, maybe so, but as informative as any post in this thread.
fast_eddie_72 wrote:
I'm an In N Out guy, but we went to five guys again tonight. No In N Out here in Denver. Five Guys is damn good, I have to admit.
Off topic? Well, maybe so, but as informative as any post in this thread.
In N Out Burger....oh, the mouth waters here on the East Coast....one of the few things I miss from the West Coast.
triumph5 wrote:
In N Out Burger....oh, the mouth waters here on the East Coast....one of the few things I miss from the West Coast.
One of the many I miss...
In N' Out is overrated California propaganda.
here in the Midwest, Culvers has the best burgers..
Hardees is a close second.
