2000-'07 Ford Focus | Buyer's Guide

By Staff Writer
Oct 4, 2022 | Ford, Focus, Buyer's Guide, GRM+ | Posted in Buyer's Guides | From the Feb. 2010 issue | Never miss an article

Photograph Courtesy Ford

Story by Manuel Cintron

Ford’s reputation for building affordable automobiles dates back to the early 1900s. In a time when cars were reserved for the rich and well heeled, Ford’s assembly line production helped to cut the Model T’s costs from near $1000 to $360 in just about 7 years. Ford was renowned for their ability to practically fling cars from their factories at an unprecedented rate, and the company quickly grew synonymous with versatility, practicality and accessibility. 

Ford’s ability to produce cars for a wide variety of people and purposes refused to wane in the decades that followed, and their later success stories include the F-Series pickups and the ever-present Mustang. Ford’s latest success has been their global C-platform car, known here as the original Ford Focus.

Ford released the Focus to the North American market for the 2000 model year, replacing its unquestionably successful—but noticeably aging—Escort model lineup. The Focus was intended to be a critical element of Ford’s New Edge architecture, and the broad model line included a hatchback, four-door sedan and five-door wagon.

The Focus replaced the Escort’s soft, mundane styling with sharper edges, upswept headlamps and an abundance of angular lines. It’s also noteworthy that the car’s North American- and European-market incarnations shared much of the same DNA, differing mainly in available powertrains.

Europe got the Focus two years before us and received several versions of the new twin-cam Zetec engine, while buyers on this side of the pond had a choice of either a 2.0-liter, single-cam engine—standard in the LX and SE four-door sedans—and the 2.0-liter DOHC Zetec. The Zetec was standard in the ZX3 hatchback and top-of-the-line ZTS sedan, while it was optional with the SE trim. Both engines were paired with either a five-speed manual transmission or an optional four-speed automatic.

The single-cam engine—a variant of the one found in the 1997 Escort and Mercury Tracer—offered 110 horsepower and was characterized by its split-port injection setup. It enjoyed little aftermarket support. The Zetec, however, was warmly received by the aftermarket and enthusiasts. Even so, both engines pulled the roughly 2500-pound Focus bodies well, and the motoring press heralded the nimble, well-balanced handling and general quality of the package; it was destined to be a winning formula. 

Variations on a Theme

Not only was the Focus lauded as a great street car, it also amassed a respectable racing pedigree, most notably in FIA World Rally competition. These six-figure machines were sent into battle with all-wheel drive and turbocharged 300-horsepower engines—and just a small touch of actual Focus DNA.

The Focus WRC racer made its debut during the 1999 season. The car quickly become a staple in the series thanks to the exploits of top drivers like Colin McRae, Carlos Sainz, Markko Märtin and, later on, Marcus Grönholm. The Focus is currently one of only two factory-supported cars in the series, outlasting former class stalwarts like the Subaru Impreza WRX and Mitsubishi Lancer Evo.

The Focus came in many flavors, from sedans and family-friendly wagons to sporty three-door hatchbacks. Their versatility extends to the motorsports world, where Focuses have been successful in rally, autocross and road racing. The sportiest U.S. model, the SVT, was available with a two-tone interior (red or blue accents) and the punchy 170-horsepower, 2.0-liter Zetec inline four. Photography Credits: Courtesy Ford

That Focus rally car would become the template for the ultimate street incarnation of the first-generation car, Ford of Europe’s turbocharged Focus RS. While the RS was never imported stateside, starting with the 2002 model year the North American Focus got its own adrenaline injection, one that sport-compact enthusiasts received with a smile. 

Ford’s Special Vehicle Team thought that their little ZX3 Focus deserved to join the ranks of the factory hotrods, so they got to work on an SVT model. To address the standard Focus’s shortcomings in the engine bay, SVT engineers concocted a massaged version of the Zetec engine. It sported a trick intake manifold, hotter cams with variable intake timing, revised internals with a bumped compression ratio, and a tuned exhaust manifold that was clearly designed for performance.

This more powerful engine was mated to a Getrag six-speed transmission. The tranny received a dual-mass flywheel intended to reduce residual noise. Along with a stiffer suspension and four-wheel disc brakes, the car was blessed with an upscale leather interior and upgraded instrumentation. More than 14,000 SVT models were built, with a five-door variant eventually joining the original three-door version.

Mild Freshening

To better integrate the model with the rest of Ford’s lineup, the Focus received a restyle for 2005. Both the interior and exterior were completely refreshed.

The engine lineup was also changed, as the horsepower increased from 130 to 136 on standard 2-liter models; the base-model, single-cam engine was dropped. The optional 2.3-liter engine received a 6-horsepower bump to 151, and this larger Duratec engine was standard on the SVT’s replacement, the ST sedan. 

The Focus ST also came standard with all-around disc brakes, ABS, 16-inch wheels, traction control and a five-speed manual transmission. Revised, sprightlier gearing made it nearly as quick as the SVT.

The Focus remained largely unchanged from 2005 until the second-generation vehicle appeared for model year 2008. Other countries got an all-new Focus based on the company’s C1 architecture, which it shared with its corporate cousins, the Volvo S40 and Mazda3. However, the second-gen U.S. car still uses  the first-generation Focus platform.

The original Focus enjoyed a long, high-volume production spell. And like so many of its forefathers, the Focus is light, simple and easy on the wallet—the perfect starting point for a performance machine.

Things to Know

One of the Focus’s biggest advantages is its huge American sales numbers—nearly 300,000 for model year 2000 alone. That means secondhand examples are very reasonably priced, though the limited-production SVT Focus fetches higher prices thanks to its greater demand.


The five-speed transmission is fairly stout, but it isn’t without faults when facing increased horsepower. Steeda’s Gus Irizarry warns that shift linkages may wear and require replacements.

Stock clutches won’t survive much past 230 horsepower at the wheels. Exedy clutches make good performance replacements, and both Richard Holdener, author of “High Performance Ford Focus Builder’s Handbook,” and Steeda vouch for the units in high-power applications. 

The factory peg-leg open differential is hardly adequate for performance duty and can be replaced with better components, like Ford Racing’s T-2 unit or a Torsen.


The factory Focus suspension is one of the car’s strongest attributes. The car grips well and exhibits good turn-in, but body roll notoriously follows. Oscillation becomes a huge issue, but good, thicker anti-roll bars can remedy the problem. 

Further improvements to the suspension can be achieved with new struts and springs. The stockers can be a wee bit soft.

The stock brakes found on the base models lack the ability to hold up to hard use, but SVT components can fix that.

The rear hub/stub axle assemblies on the base model can flex under load and lead to wheel bearing problems. Steeda recommends swapping to the Focus RS parts.


Most buyers avoid the SPI engines for anything other than pedestrian applications. Valve issues have been reported, and these can result in catastrophic engine failure around 100,000 miles. 

The 16-valve Zetec is the trusted workhorse. Despite the bad rumors, don’t always believe what you hear. Early attempts at forced induction didn’t go so well, but today’s Focus tuners have proclaimed the Zetec to be robust with a competent tune.

The Zetec responds well to standard bolt-ons like intakes, headers, exhausts, head work and the occasional 75 shot of nitrous. FSWerks, Steeda and Ford Racing all stock performance parts. 

FSWerks offers a huge selection of bolt-on parts for the Focus, including turbo kits for both the 2.0- and 2.3-liter Duratec. They promise a 75-plus-percent boost in performance with the 2.3-liter engine turbo kit; the 2.0-liter engine’s output rises by at least 70 percent.

Watch the timing belt, especially on 2000 and 2001 examples. O-ring leaks can occur at both the thermostat and the water pump.

Steeda has tuned a naturally-aspirated Duratec to 204 horsepower at the wheels. They used Cosworth’s cylinder head, camshafts and intake manifold.

Want more torque? Kugel Komponents offers a kit that puts a small-block Ford V8 and 8.8-inch rear end in the Focus chassis. The real kicker: It’s a bolt-in kit.

Body and Interior

Focus exteriors are fairly resistant to wear, but thanks to a combination of rigorous commuter duty and a slanted hood, don’t be surprised to find some chipped paint and clear coat wear on the nose, especially on the front fascia.

Shed some weight. Steeda offers a 15-pound carbon fiber hood for the 2000-’04 Focus

Both the leather and cloth interiors resist tears nicely, but owners of cloth upholstery swear that it has the unique ability to absorb stains that can never be removed. The interior plastics, meanwhile, hold up well and show above-average resistance to scratching. 

Join Free Join our community to easily find more Ford, Focus, Buyer's Guide and GRM+ articles.
More like this
View comments on the GRM forums
Appleseed MegaDork
12/28/21 10:20 a.m.

Don't let the parts house website fool you, the wagon suspension is EXACTLY the same as the sedan/hatch. Only the length of the shocks is different.  They stood them up for a flatter floor. There seem to be no performance dampers for the rear (front is identical on same year cars) although, if you were serious about a motorsports longroof, you could measure the compressed/extended height and go from there although no one on Focaljet or Focus Fanatics has figured that out.

Robbie (Forum Supporter)
Robbie (Forum Supporter) GRM+ Memberand MegaDork
12/28/21 10:22 a.m.

I really loved driving my little silver SVT. Looked basically like the one in that photo. 

GTwannaB GRM+ Memberand HalfDork
12/28/21 11:21 p.m.

In reply to Robbie (Forum Supporter) :

That is just like my current car but with the 8 spoke wheels. By today's standards maybe not too impressive but the feel and eagerness is pretty entertaining. Throttle by cable make a meaningful difference. 

OK if we are geeking out of Foci or at least I am, here is my bench racing build for the perfect MK1 Focus. 
Start with 2008/2009 2dr SES coupe, not the hatch but the less common one with only two actual doors. Add camber plates, street able coil overs and SVT sway bars. 
- Engine swap for ultimate build is Fiesta ST motor and tranny with a LSD. I suspect not simple and would be tough to make legal in my state of CA. 
-Swap option 2. Find a 2.5l from Fusion and swap in for torquey light weight combo. 
-Realistic build with just warm cams and head work on OEM 2.0 Duratec, but for the sake of dreaming, could you swap in a Mazda 6 speed from a MZR Mazda3/6 into a Duratec Focus?

I feel like this would be a Ford B13 SE-R with slightly more modern components.

cfvwtuner New Reader
12/29/21 10:12 a.m.

We still have our 00 ZX3 ordered way back in 99.  Koni Adjustables, Progress springs, Eibach sway bars, autopower roll bar, 5 point harness, Magnaflow exhaust, now with SVT Recaro seats and black housing headlights. 17" SVT 5 spokes for street, 225/50/15 Kuhmo R compounds for fun. We put 100K on it in less than 5 years.  It was autocrossed and tracked since new. It's been mothballed since she fot her 16 Focus SE Sport.

thedoc GRM+ Memberand HalfDork
12/31/21 1:32 p.m.

We had an svt and I totally fell in love with the car.  She had been beat on, and another showed up with a power works supercharger.  THAT car was so great, fast, comfortable and we even hauled an inflatable pool with it!  Alas, it was t-boned by a prius during an ice storm.  I was able to buy it back from the insurance and sold it at a profit.  Seriously great car that we still miss.

thedoc GRM+ Memberand HalfDork
12/31/21 1:38 p.m.

Seriously bad day, if I was hit on the other side, a much worse day 

Captdownshift (Forum Supporter)
Captdownshift (Forum Supporter) GRM+ Memberand MegaDork
12/31/21 2:01 p.m.

I'll take mine in 2.3l duratec ZX3 guise with cosworth intake manifold, cams, AWR engine and transmission mount, a quaiffe and gravel coilovers.

alfadriver GRM+ Memberand MegaDork
12/31/21 2:35 p.m.

This was the car that drove the final stake between me and Car & Driver.  Regardless of how good the objective numbers were in their tests, it always finished last just because.  The last one was when it was the best for fuel economy and second in performance, but was dead last in an econobox comparison.  Mostly because they just didn't like that the solid chassis wasn't new.

(it wasn't much beyond that when my long time R&T subscription ended, and just beyond that Autoeveryonceinawhile)

Tom_Spangler (Forum Supporter)
Tom_Spangler (Forum Supporter) GRM+ Memberand PowerDork
12/31/21 3:45 p.m.
alfadriver said:

This was the car that drove the final stake between me and Car & Driver.  Regardless of how good the objective numbers were in their tests, it always finished last just because.  The last one was when it was the best for fuel economy and second in performance, but was dead last in an econobox comparison.  Mostly because they just didn't like that the solid chassis wasn't new.

(it wasn't much beyond that when my long time R&T subscription ended, and just beyond that Autoeveryonceinawhile)

It did well early in it's run, then they started dinging it for being out of date. I think when the Mk 2 came out in Europe and we didn't get it, that started the negativity. One other thing C&D always complained about were the factory seats, and they weren't wrong about those.

My daughter's first car was an '07 5-door SES with the 2.3L and the auto. That car took a BEATING from her and kept on ticking. I did a lot of maintenance catchup when we got it and some body work when she hit a deer. You could certainly tell it was built to a price point and some corners were cut, but still, it was overall a solid, dependable, efficient car, and pretty fun and tossable. 

alfadriver GRM+ Memberand MegaDork
12/31/21 5:03 p.m.

In reply to Tom_Spangler (Forum Supporter) :

It may have been "out of date"- but at the same time, it was still better than the other cars being tested, objectively.  And it still got bashed and finished last.

At the same time, the Mustangs and Corvettes at the time were some of the fastest cars when running their one lap test- regularly beating cars well above their class, and they still got hammered.   And I won't mention the car brands that got extra credit for the brand.

I really don't understand what they had against their US co-workers, but it was enough that I just got tired of it.

Our Preferred Partners