03Panther
03Panther PowerDork
10/2/24 12:48 a.m.

Shelby AC Cobra, Powered by Ford

He is quite proud of his details. 
Some of you here, may know if he's right!

ShawnG
ShawnG MegaDork
10/2/24 12:59 a.m.

Continuation = replica = not genuine. Even if it's from Shelby.

Still, it's all the fun for a lot less than the real thing.

Updated?

All Cobras had rack and pinion steering and 4 wheel independent suspension.

Docwemple
Docwemple Dork
10/2/24 1:20 a.m.

I wonder if it's asymmetrical, like the originals

David S. Wallens
David S. Wallens Editorial Director
10/2/24 9:26 a.m.

Some Cobra info: The first ones had worm-and-sector steering but, true, by the time the 427 came out, Shelby had moved to rack-and-pinion-steering. (This 1963 Cobra is billed as the last worm-and-sector example.)

ShawnG
ShawnG MegaDork
10/2/24 9:39 a.m.

In reply to David S. Wallens :

Must have been a change mid-run then. The '65 289 Cobra we restored had rack and pinion.

David S. Wallens
David S. Wallens Editorial Director
10/2/24 9:42 a.m.

In reply to ShawnG :

Yeah, the switch came in 1963.

03Panther
03Panther PowerDork
10/2/24 10:28 a.m.

I grew up loving the excess of the 427 Cobras. And the Super Snake Bill Cosby talked about spinning out in. 
Since then, and all the replicas, I actually prefer the more understated 289 cars. 
 

At Fords 100th, I talked to a lady form CA that had, and drove, a all original 289 Cobra. Very cool lady! She had the same opinion on the continuation cars. A bit more "authentic" than the kit cars? Maybe. But it's definitely not a 1965 , and should not be billed as one!

californiamilleghia
californiamilleghia UberDork
10/2/24 11:34 a.m.

Shelby and his people were great at keeping the "Brand" going  , and the continuation cars were a super  idea.

and then we have the Kirkham replicas  that were made in Poland , and the Daytona coupe replicas.....

 

 

03Panther
03Panther PowerDork
10/2/24 1:13 p.m.

In reply to californiamilleghia :

Personally, I was (and am) 100% in support of the continuation cars. Including sequential chassis numbers. But don't call it a 1965, 'cause it ain't! 
How many of those did Shelby build, btw?

Also, ad mentions all 427 versions of the FE (or implies) were Aluminum blocks. They were not. Were all the new ones even FE engines? I know most kits are not. 

David S. Wallens
David S. Wallens Editorial Director
10/2/24 1:22 p.m.
CAinCA
CAinCA GRM+ Memberand Dork
10/2/24 3:18 p.m.

I remember reading somewhere that Shelby made and stored a bunch of Cobra chassis. That way technically they could call them 65s. 

SKJSS (formerly Klayfish)
SKJSS (formerly Klayfish) UltimaDork
10/2/24 3:43 p.m.

I was heavy into the replica community for almost 10 years.  Ugh...my view is a bit sour.

Woody (Forum Supportum)
Woody (Forum Supportum) GRM+ Memberand MegaDork
10/2/24 8:30 p.m.
ShawnG said:

In reply to David S. Wallens :

Must have been a change mid-run then. The '65 289 Cobra we restored had rack and pinion.

The switch from steering box to rack and pinion happened right around the same time that they went from Simths gauges to Stewart Warner. So if you see one with SW gauges, it probably has rack and pinion too. 

You'll need to log in to post.

Our Preferred Partners
sZWPD2WCzDfTfeHoKjWtvkfByqr0I5rcV6Fscm0MVCMO9ksgIpgpbGn6ERpMTT69