Tom Suddard
Tom Suddard GRM+ Memberand Digital Experience Director
2/5/18 3:28 p.m.
feature_image

When we tore down our $400 LS1, we discovered some positive things and some negative things. We also discovered a horrible thing: The stock 853-code heads, which are regarded as some of the worst flowing to ever top an LS-based engine. We didn't quite know what our engine's destiny would be, but we knew there was no sense in …

Read the rest of the story

NickD
NickD UltraDork
2/5/18 3:39 p.m.

5.3L heads can have LS1-sized valves installed in them, and have a slightly smaller combustion chamber that will give a compression boost.

Jerry From LA
Jerry From LA SuperDork
2/5/18 3:40 p.m.

Good to see this one's still moving forward albeit slowly.  What years and models did the 799 heads appear in?

 

Tom Suddard
Tom Suddard GRM+ Memberand Digital Experience Director
2/5/18 3:47 p.m.

799 heads are from 2005 and newer 4.8 and 5.3-liter trucks.

Patrick
Patrick GRM+ Memberand MegaDork
2/5/18 3:54 p.m.

FYI the front drive 5.3 engines have 243 heads

noddaz
noddaz GRM+ Memberand SuperDork
2/5/18 4:15 p.m.

JB Weld for the win!

dean1484
dean1484 GRM+ Memberand MegaDork
2/5/18 4:49 p.m.

5.3 heads have been a well kept secret for a while.  How do you think you get 400hp from a 5.3 with just a cam change and a carb?  It is all about the stock heads on those being so good.  

Will
Will UltraDork
2/5/18 5:36 p.m.

Been a minute, but aren't the rockers in 5.3 heads better than the LS1 parts?

JBasham
JBasham HalfDork
3/19/18 12:04 p.m.

I'm loving this project.  But I have to say, I have always thought the reason motor-swappers pay up for an LS engine instead of a Ford was the turn-key package of HP and TQ.  None of that fussing around required with SBF.  This project is making me rethink that.

You'll need to log in to post.

Our Preferred Partners
AisovhtNzqJ4BDfKt1N6iua9zmsCKDW5rqcLFDRmxbSDq6bjQBNOVcmWBC02Cy2c