1 2 3 4
FlightService
FlightService MegaDork
9/27/17 8:09 a.m.

A long, long time ago, way back in 2012 we had a thread on this.

 

As time marches on, the answer may need updating.  What is the lightest and most compact package for a reliable 400hp?  Bonus points for cost but that is a secondary consideration.  The ability to pass 48 state emissions is mandatory.

 

annnnnd go.

Jaynen
Jaynen SuperDork
9/27/17 8:24 a.m.

At least you didn't also say "cheap"

singleslammer
singleslammer PowerDork
9/27/17 8:31 a.m.

Ford cyclone? It might be able to do it without boost and isnt direct injected like the GM version.

The 2.3l ecoboost is up to 350 stock. 400 should be pretty easy.

tuna55
tuna55 MegaDork
9/27/17 8:34 a.m.

Some interesting data here

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YnIIS8COdj4

tuna55
tuna55 MegaDork
9/27/17 8:37 a.m.

Also quite a bit of a difference between iron and aluminum gen III/IV blocks

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_M9I6_DpYzg

z31maniac
z31maniac MegaDork
9/27/17 8:37 a.m.
singleslammer said:

Ford cyclone? It might be able to do it without boost and isnt direct injected like the GM version.

The 2.3l ecoboost is up to 350 stock. 400 should be pretty easy.

And popping headgaskets everywhere :)

z31maniac
z31maniac MegaDork
9/27/17 8:38 a.m.

GM ERod crate motor seems to be the answer?

oldopelguy
oldopelguy UltraDork
9/27/17 9:36 a.m.

Ecoboost v6

 

FlightService
FlightService MegaDork
9/27/17 9:42 a.m.
Jaynen said:

At least you didn't also say "cheap"

I am learning to manage my expectations...

z31maniac
z31maniac MegaDork
9/27/17 9:47 a.m.
oldopelguy said:

Ecoboost v6

 

How does a twin turbo V6 = light and/or compact?

Bobzilla
Bobzilla MegaDork
9/27/17 9:50 a.m.

LSx crate motor is about the easiest, most reliable you're going to find. Not that large of an engine either. 

FlightService
FlightService MegaDork
9/27/17 10:12 a.m.

In reply to Bobzilla :

LSx not LSX, right?  Because the LSX in an iron block, not as light as it could be.

singleslammer
singleslammer PowerDork
9/27/17 10:15 a.m.
z31maniac said:
singleslammer said:

Ford cyclone? It might be able to do it without boost and isnt direct injected like the GM version.

The 2.3l ecoboost is up to 350 stock. 400 should be pretty easy.

And popping headgaskets everywhere :)

No one said it had to be stock. There have to solutions for that.

Bobzilla
Bobzilla MegaDork
9/27/17 10:20 a.m.

In reply to FlightService :

Correct. LS1, LS3, LS6, LS7 etc.... hence the small "x". Now the iron block LSX is pretty damn stout and I'd suggest that if you were wanting 800hp reliably. But that wasn't the initial question. 

GameboyRMH
GameboyRMH GRM+ Memberand MegaDork
9/27/17 10:28 a.m.

+1 for recent LS variant. Many of the best new engines are light but are large-to-enormous due to having one or more turbos on them, or having DOHC and multiple cylinder banks at the same time.

Maybe a Tesla S motor if the battery doesn't count cheeky

wspohn
wspohn Dork
9/27/17 10:29 a.m.

Easy with a slight turbo change and a retune on an Ecotec LNF.  Lots of guys running around with that 2.0 little 4 cylinder with 400 bhp - they don't even need to open up th engine to get it.

You'd only need rods and pistons if you headed for 500 bhp. 

My conservatively built (375 bhp  375 Tq) engine still gets 30 mpg in a 3,000 lb. car when you are cruising.

 

 

GameboyRMH
GameboyRMH GRM+ Memberand MegaDork
9/27/17 10:33 a.m.
wspohn said:

Easy with a slight turbo change and a retune on an Ecotec LNF.  Lots of guys running around with that 2.0 little 4 cylinder with 400 bhp - they don't even need to open up th engine to get it.

But size-wise with the turbo equipment, an LNF is at least the same volume as an LS, which doesn't have the reliability negative of a turbo. I'm sure it's still lighter but it's not a clear win in a size-and-reliability contest.

oldeskewltoy
oldeskewltoy UltraDork
9/27/17 11:03 a.m.

NISSAN BUILDS AN 88 POUND 3-CYLINDER ENGINE THAT MAKES 400 HP

 

FuzzWuzzy
FuzzWuzzy New Reader
9/27/17 11:11 a.m.

I think at this point in time, the answer is still an aluminum LS

GameboyRMH
GameboyRMH GRM+ Memberand MegaDork
9/27/17 11:16 a.m.
oldeskewltoy said:

NISSAN BUILDS AN 88 POUND 3-CYLINDER ENGINE THAT MAKES 400 HP

Well this definitely wins on weight and size, and it meets the power requirement, but you'll have to ask Nissan how long this LMP engine can go between rebuilds, and how much they'd charge for one...

Zomby Woof
Zomby Woof PowerDork
9/27/17 11:19 a.m.
GameboyRMH said:
wspohn said:

Easy with a slight turbo change and a retune on an Ecotec LNF.  Lots of guys running around with that 2.0 little 4 cylinder with 400 bhp - they don't even need to open up th engine to get it.

But size-wise with the turbo equipment, an LNF is at least the same volume as an LS, which doesn't have the reliability negative of a turbo. I'm sure it's still lighter but it's not a clear win in a size-and-reliability contest.

Still quite a bit smaller and a lot lighter than a LS

jharry3
jharry3 GRM+ Memberand Reader
9/27/17 11:39 a.m.

Nitrous Oxide will get you there.  You said cheap.  Meth heading the engine is cheap.

FlightService
FlightService MegaDork
9/27/17 12:02 p.m.

Yeah the little Nissan engine brought all this conversation to the front of my head but for 1 it isn't available for general purchase but it does win outright.

Turbo 2.0 seems a neat trick, God knows Honda is selling one they admit is good for more than 400hp.

 

Ecotec with a turbo...interesting thought.

chaparral
chaparral Dork
9/27/17 12:17 p.m.

A methanol-burning turbocharged Honda B should be good for 400 hp within a 250# package.

Jaynen
Jaynen SuperDork
9/27/17 12:20 p.m.

That motown LS block in the video posted was REALLY interesting

1 2 3 4

You'll need to log in to post.

Our Preferred Partners
VlWdwwoqLKCXtap81rdcKyon9nK2BwGL3F1MFXC1qd56yMlPMLULJUUHMV5mvdWH