Hmm ok, it's not like there is enough stock mustang left of it that you can really tell anymore lol. It's always listed as a Shelby gt350 so maybe that's why I thought it was.
Hmm ok, it's not like there is enough stock mustang left of it that you can really tell anymore lol. It's always listed as a Shelby gt350 so maybe that's why I thought it was.
Flight Service wrote:
That rabbit is why I keep declining to sell me set of wide flares....
Hmmm trying to imagine a G Body with box flares .
^Does want!!
Flight Service wrote:
Nice... Any pictures of the VW instead of the Opel? 
In reply to noddaz:
Hard has hell to find that one to be honest!
The first few pages of Google were all from GRM.
Congrats you bunch of junkies, we are effecting the internet.
Flight Service wrote: *snip* Congrats you bunch of junkies, we are effecting the internet.
You say that like it is a bad thing...
I've noticed GRM has some pretty good search engine optimization. Seems like a disproportionate amount of search results tend to come from this site when I'm looking for more info on a topic I read about on here. Hell, I've even found threads I created a long time ago asking the same question.
Gasoline wrote: '69 Dart?
I think that may have started out as an early '70's Brazilian Dart:
Wally wrote:
Thank you for that Wally. It is even an Olds.
Flight Service wrote:
Is there anything CCWs don't look good on? Sheesh!
Flight Service wrote:
Quoted simply so I can see it twice on the page.
Rad.
chandlerGTi wrote:Flight Service wrote:Is there anything CCWs don't look good on? Sheesh!
Everything? CCW "classics" look terrible on everything...
Maroon92 wrote:chandlerGTi wrote:Everything? CCW "classics" look terrible on everything...Flight Service wrote:Is there anything CCWs don't look good on? Sheesh!
Wrong, CCW 'classics' look so awesome they almost rescue a far with satin paint!
You'll need to log in to post.
