David S. Wallens
David S. Wallens Editorial Director
10/28/11 10:52 p.m.

Does this mean they're back in the game?

http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2098090,00.html

Streetwiseguy
Streetwiseguy Dork
10/28/11 10:59 p.m.

$141 million seems like a lot of money to pay for a company that hasn't made a dime in a couple decades, but I don't really grasp the concepts of multinational corporation high finances. Or government finances. I just pay my Visa card off every month...

mad_machine
mad_machine GRM+ Memberand SuperDork
10/29/11 6:15 a.m.

who knows how much money saab actually made. Since GM owned them, they have been playing a shell game with the finances

dean1484
dean1484 GRM+ Memberand SuperDork
10/29/11 7:23 a.m.

You could see some intresting cars from saab if this goes through.

car39
car39 HalfDork
10/29/11 11:40 a.m.

GM sold SAAB for more than 360 million, so 141 isn't such a bad price. The Chinese have taken a hands off approach at Volvo (so far) maybe it isn't the end for Svenska Aeorplan AktieBolaget

fifty
fifty Reader
10/29/11 4:07 p.m.

It'll be interesting to see if they continue to run Saab as an automotive company. If I were a Chinese manufacturer , I'd strip Saab of it's intellectual and physical holdings to help make better vehicles (since Chinese cars are crap) and then dump it.

You'll need to log in to post.

Our Preferred Partners
G2xBUAFFP40COp5RDRhz2cNdzbADL6iIlqlo02svGX3iqhEvVdMl5DxkBPXMHeyz