HiTempguy
HiTempguy Reader
1/30/09 12:25 p.m.

To thank your government for trying to screw us over.

http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20090129/Buy_American_090129/20090129?hub=TopStories

Edit- Really, I don't care except for the fact that there is a standing agreement called NAFTA that we have. It'd be nice to be shown a bit more respect is all. It hasn't actually be signed by Obama yet from what I understand, but after his mentioning of NAFTA during his running for presidency...

Osterizer
Osterizer HalfDork
1/30/09 12:37 p.m.

Rising tariffs in no small way helped bring the Great Depression.

What a wonderful idea.

Xceler8x
Xceler8x GRM+ Memberand HalfDork
1/30/09 12:37 p.m.

Well..it's not like we're trying to screw you over. It's more like we're trying to help ourselves out of a financial crisis. Nothing personal really. Just some self-preservation.

neon4891
neon4891 SuperDork
1/30/09 12:40 p.m.

I hope it gets reworked as exempting canada, it would be a bad idea to alienate our biggest tradding partner.

+1 for canadian beer

HiTempguy
HiTempguy Reader
1/30/09 12:48 p.m.
Xceler8x wrote: Well..it's not like we're trying to screw you over. It's more like we're trying to help ourselves out of a financial crisis. Nothing personal really. Just some self-preservation.

Oh for sure, just like the whole "dirty oil" that Alberta produces and the government started making a big deal about a couple of months ago. Hm.

So, the $8 billion it takes away from us (a country 1/10 in population) compared to the hundreds of billions in government aid thats recently been passed through in the US to try and solve this problem.. ya, kind of sounds knee jerk/screw over-ish don't you think?

I'm all for countries needing to do what they have to do, but lets keep it in perspective. That $8 billion will do nothing (relatively speaking) for the states. That $8 billion is a huge chunk of cash for Canada. Thats what I am getting at. Plus the whole NAFTA thing.

Osterizer
Osterizer HalfDork
1/30/09 12:50 p.m.
Xceler8x wrote: Well..it's not like we're trying to screw you over. It's more like we're trying to help ourselves out of a financial crisis. Nothing personal really. Just some self-preservation.

In the northern spirit: Halibut...

This is an incredibly misguided attempt at self-preservation. As previously stated, raising tariffs during a time of financial crisis is a pretty bone-headed move. It will lead to counter-raising of tariffs, and strangle industries.

Snowdoggie
Snowdoggie Reader
1/30/09 12:51 p.m.

So the Canadians want some pork too?

Strizzo
Strizzo Dork
1/30/09 1:06 p.m.
HiTempguy wrote: I'm all for countries needing to do what they have to do, but lets keep it in perspective. That $8 billion will do nothing (relatively speaking) for the states.

tell that to the US steel workers

Salanis
Salanis SuperDork
1/30/09 1:19 p.m.

There's more to be gained, and less to be lost, by nurturing markets abroad than by mandating production at home.

NGTD
NGTD HalfDork
1/30/09 6:21 p.m.
Strizzo wrote:
HiTempguy wrote: I'm all for countries needing to do what they have to do, but lets keep it in perspective. That $8 billion will do nothing (relatively speaking) for the states.
tell that to the US steel workers

Try doing it without our oil or natural gas!

My point is that some people, especially legislators, in the U.S. are quick to want to close of the borders to our businesses, if we did the same the M1 Abrams would roll north pretty quick!

Salanis
Salanis SuperDork
1/30/09 6:32 p.m.
NGTD wrote: My point is that some people, especially legislators, in the U.S. are quick to want to close of the borders to our businesses, if we did the same the M1 Abrams would roll north pretty quick!

War. War never changes...

Fallout said: War. War never changes. The Romans waged war to gather slaves and wealth. Spain built an empire from its lust for gold and territory. Hitler shaped a battered germany into an economic superpower. But war never changes. In the 21st century, war was still waged over the resources that could be acquired. Only this time, the spoils of war were also its weapons... petroleum and uranium. For these resources, China would invade Alaska, the US would annex Canada, and the European commonwealth would dissolve into quarreling, bickering nation-states, bent on controlling the last remaining resources on earth. ...
HiTempguy
HiTempguy Reader
1/31/09 12:15 a.m.

^^^Didn't we already take out the White House once? I'm sure we could do it again

GregTivo
GregTivo Reader
1/31/09 12:27 a.m.

Well, really all he promised was change. Rapid descent into poverty across the board is change...

Goldmember
Goldmember New Reader
1/31/09 1:10 a.m.
GregTivo wrote: Well, really all he promised was change. Rapid descent into poverty across the board is change...

I want to laugh out loud, but it has too much reality in it.

TJ
TJ Reader
1/31/09 7:07 a.m.

The people in DC who we pay to represent us, are trying their best to make this recession into a depression. Why is it that they cannot accomplish most things they try, but it looks like they know exactly how to do this one?

neon4891
neon4891 SuperDork
1/31/09 1:20 p.m.

Nice link, but I was exspecting "Canadian Bacon"

You'll need to log in to post.

Our Preferred Partners
7e9jcHnUQtEuaupeq89xSJCFDcR1olOJdiZwN8U79P7m0oIJksyFNOg7KfClSmiQ