Why wasn't this thought of before?

Or, who's brave enough to make a batch.

Oreo stuffed Chocolate Chip Cookies

(I took the time to track down the original. So they claim.)

It's so obvious once you see it that you've got to wonder why we haven't all done it.

Sending this to my daughter so she can make me a batch.

Those would make excellent buns for some kind of sandwich.

Giant Purple Snorklewacker wrote: Those would make excellent buns for some kind of sandwich.

An icecream sandwich!

I've had these. They are unphkingbelievable.

My GOD MAN! What will they come up with next? Nothing, I say! first the wheel, then the internal combustion engine, then sliced bread, and Now THIS! It is most certainly the end-times, I can conceive of no greater contribution to the cosmos, all that is left for us is to fade into oblivion.

Should be wrapped in bacon.

DoctorBlade wrote: Oreo stuffed Chocolate Chip Cookies

gasp!

Zomby woof wrote: Should be wrapped in bacon.

GASP!!!

Holy crap, and I thought the deep fried oreos and twinkies I obliterated in Vegas last weekend were awesome...

Those look amazing. The link is now in my favorites.

You could make a whole cookbook about existing food stuffed inside of other food.

To be honest, they look kinda sickly/overly sweet to me.

We could make it like a Turduckin: an oreo in a chocolate chip cookie, in a cinnamon roll. A Cinchipeo.

To take it one step further, we could put all that in a cake.

Salanis wrote: We could make it like a Turduckin: an oreo in a chocolate chip cookie, in a cinnamon roll. A Cinchipeo. To take it one step further, we could put all that in a cake.

And put that on top of a pie. Behold the BOSTON CACICHEO!

Luke wrote: You could make a whole cookbook about existing food stuffed inside of other food. To be honest, they look kinda sickly/overly sweet to me.

I thought that initially, but really, one alone is not bad, why would two be bad? Neither are too sugary on their own, they are adding more sugar, but at the same time more substance. I doubt it would be anymore overly sweet than a cookie or oreo.

Now, you do have to remember that it is 2 cookies in one, so if you normally eat 2 cookies in a sitting you can only have 1.

Why would you spoil delicious homemade chocolate-chip cookies by stuffing freaking Oreos in them? Yuck.

mtn wrote:

Giant Purple Snorklewacker wrote: Those would make excellent buns for some kind of sandwich.

An icecream sandwich!

You are a goddamn genius. If you made an ice cream sandwich out of that people would be compelled to chant your name, write songs about you... pick you up and carry you around on their shoulders ALL THE TIME!

As one of the apparently small handfull of americans that dislikes chocolate I just look at that picture and shake my head.

That looks nasty.

ditchdigger wrote: As one of the apparently small handfull of americans that dislikes chocolate I just look at that picture and shake my head. That looks nasty.

ditchdigger wrote: As one of the apparently small handfull of americans that dislikes chocolate I just look at that picture and shake my head. That looks nasty.

BANHAMMER!

Jay wrote: Why would you spoil delicious homemade chocolate-chip cookies by stuffing freaking Oreos in them? Yuck.

I agree. I like Oreos, but this is lily-gilding of the lowest order. My chocolate chips cookies are fine as is.

The chocolate chip cookies look badass enough as they are, don't need no crappy in-store oreo cookie ruining the batch!

Giant Purple Snorklewacker wrote:

mtn wrote:

Giant Purple Snorklewacker wrote: Those would make excellent buns for some kind of sandwich.

An icecream sandwich!

You are a goddamn genius. If you made an ice cream sandwich out of that people would be compelled to chant your name, write songs about you... pick you up and carry you around on their shoulders ALL THE TIME!

I think what needs to happen is it needs to be made into an ice cream sammich, and then covered in chocolate magic shell like they have at DQ for the dip cones.

This, ladies and gentlemen, is why I never fear for job security.

BIRD IN A BIRD IN A BIRD IN A BIRD IN A BIRD IN A BIRD IN A PIG

92CelicaHalfTrac wrote: BIRD IN A BIRD IN A BIRD IN A BIRD IN A BIRD IN A BIRD IN A PIG

It's already been invented. It's called the Food Chain.

Margie