Whats up everyone!
This is more to get opinions than anything. Currently I own a '99 Miata with ~83k miles on it. I own an '89 E30 325is with ~130k on it. The Miata is kind of my weekend/autocross/nice day car. The E30 is more my daily trooper/practical/future-S52-swap-track-car project car. If I sold both, I could probably pull in around $8,000.
Now an interesting situation has arose. The problem in question is this:
http://www.ksl.com/auto/listing/1564430?ad_cid=5
Very clean and well maintained E36 M3. Guy says he will part with it for $8,200. So basically, I can ditch both current cars, and pick up a pristine E36 M3, a car known for its ability to be both a livable daily driver, and a potent track toy.
So I was just curious what your opinions are. Would you rather have two, cheaper, older fun cars, or one do-it-all car thats much nicer? Insurance is dead cheap on the two cars I own since I am paying minimums only. If I were to spring for the E36, I would probably get a better policy.
I think for what I'm doing, the 2 car option is probably better. I can throw one around the track and have fun with it, and if it breaks down or if I put it into a wall, I have a backup car. However, I'm not sure I want to dump money into an E30 when it is as old as it is, and when the E36 is just that much more sorted of a car. The E36 suspension setup is much better than the E30's oldschool strut and trailing arm setup (so I hear).
Anyway, I will probably keep both cars, but if there was an M3 to buy around here, that would be the car. I haven't seen such a well maintained example ever on our local listings.
What are your guys' thoughts? You can make comments specific to my situation, or just about the whole 2 cars vs 1 car thing in general. Thank you, as always!