Here's a look at the first draft of the 2010 ruleset. I'm going to clarify with the track about things like long pants, etc so it's spelled out explicitly.
Car Building and Budgets 1. This Challenge is designed and run as an editorial event for a privately owned magazine. As such, the rules and event should be taken with a certain spirit in mind. In other words, all entrants should play well with others. It will make the event much more pleasant for all of those involved. Grassroots Motorsports reserves the right to refuse entry to any individuals or teams. Individuals or teams that behave in a manner that reflects poorly on this event or the magazine will be immediately disqualified and their entries will be removed from the editorial write-up. 2. If the rules do not say you can do something, you cannot do it. 3. Cars must be constructed so that they can be raced in a safe manner. Driver ingress and egress must be considered in the construction of the car. In the case of an accident, the driver must be able to exit the car quickly and safely. We strongly encourage that the builders bring their cars to a licensed NHRA technical inspector (see item on Safety Inspections) for their review of the car. 4. Vehicles and their component systems may be modified or substituted while observing the guidelines set forth by these rules. Drivetrains, suspensions, brakes, exteriors, interiors, electrical systems and fuel systems may be modified. Wheels and tires may be replaced. 5. Only Production-based passenger road cars are allowed in the regular competition. All Locosts, race cars, kit cars, Zambonis and the like are allowed only in the Special class (See Rule #27). 6. Cars must be roadworthy, meaning basic street equipment must be present: functioning headlights, uncracked windshields, working brake lights, working horn and DOT-approved tires. 7. Non-DOT-legal slicks are allowed at the drag strip, but they must be replaced by DOT-legal tires for the autocross competition. 8. All major body panels of the car that are being used as a foundation for the Challenge car must be present at all times on the car. This includes the floor pan, inner fender panels, hoods, fenders, roof, sills, etc. Bumpers may be removed or replaced. Full frame cars must retain their full frame, while unibody or subframe cars must retain their full floor pans, subframes and the like. Exceptions to this rule are listed in Rule #9. 9. Modifications may be made to the original unibody or body and body panels and frame for engine and suspension swaps and modifications, but only to the extent neccessary to perform the change. This can include removing portions of the stock unibody and frame and replacing them with corresponding sections from a donor production car, or clearancing for engine and suspension modifications. 10. Interiors may be gutted, although the basic dashboard or dashpad must remain. If the original dashboard pad has since rotted or deteriorated away, it may be replaced with a full width piece of aluminum. 11. Windows may be replaced with clear Lexan or polycarbonate that meets all safety requirements. 12. Fenders and hoods may be replaced as long as the replacement is solid and safe, resembles the original piece and has a positive latching device. Exceptions to this rule must be approved prior to the event by the GRM staff.
Cars do not have to be built for any recognized sanctioned race class. Nitrous oxide, forced induction and radical engine swaps are permitted. (As per SCCA rules, nitrous oxide shall not be used at the autocross event.)
A Special class for Locosts/Race Cars/Kit Cars/Specials will be run for exhibition only. It will be scored independently from the rest of the competitors. The Special class competitors will only be eligible for the Special class trophies, unless one of them explodes spectacularly. Then we might reconsider. Special class cars must also meet the classification requirements for a recognized autocross class (for example: SCCA’s A Modified). These cars must meet all Challenge budget rules and safety regulations with the following exceptions: a) The cars do not have to be roadworthy. headlights, windshields and horns are not required b) non-DOT approved racing slicks are allowed
Protests: Any car may be protested by another entrant.
Since the formatting isn't exactly accurate here on the message board, can you highlight the changes?
Eric
Small tweaks here and there.
Fenders/hoods must be on the car at all times. exceptions to this must be approved by the GRM staff beforehand.
I also added to the specials class.
Per
[quote="Rules 8 and 9"]
there were a couple of cars running without hoods because they were having a hard time managing the heat at the drags. will this no longer be allowed?
Per Schroeder wrote: Not really, Andy called ahead on his. I just want to keep cars looking good for the editorial.
I meant more of them being somewhat Andy inspired rule updates. Realizing my thoughts didn't flow out onto the keyboard very well.
Also curious about the hood thing. As it can be a simple fix to cooling issues. And boy was it hot this year.
Per-can we clarify the rollbar requirements for open roof cars?
In $08 I was told my roofless Miata couldn't run the drags unless I had a rollbar. I argued for a bit (including mentioning the fact that I thought the NHRA rulebook disagreed with him) but he wouldn't budge. I managed to borrow a hardtop to appease him. This year several Miatae showed up topless and sans rollbar and were allowed to run. Is their an official ruling on what is required. It was part of the reason our car didn't come back this year and if I bring it back next year I need to be sure.
Thanks
John Brown wrote: From th epixxors it looked like a convertible CRX may have added to that rule as well.
Very true. I do now even remember thinking about it with regards to the way the rule was written this year. Let alone the rule adjustment for next year.
MrJoshua wrote: Per-can we clarify the rollbar requirements for open roof cars? In $08 I was told my roofless Miata couldn't run the drags unless I had a rollbar. I argued for a bit (including mentioning the fact that I thought the NHRA rulebook disagreed with him) but he wouldn't budge. I managed to borrow a hardtop to appease him. This year several Miatae showed up topless and sans rollbar and were allowed to run. Is their an official ruling on what is required. It was part of the reason our car didn't come back this year and if I bring it back next year I need to be sure. Thanks
Very curious about this... as I am going to be Miata based next season also.
I was also curious about the topless CRX. I thought that you could remove a roof if the car was also available as a convertible. Did they do some thing to satisfy this, like have the roof at the Challenge but in the trailer?
Also, I didn't see any topless Miatae run the drags sans rollbar, but I did run mine with just the soft top. (I expected that my time would have been limited to 14.0 should that have been an issue.) Were any actually permitted to run open without a rollbar and arm restraints?
what would the fair market value of a big aluminum wing be? Say, i traded a case of beer for the wing... Would the wing be worth the case of Beer, or worth what someone would pay at Pep Boys?
Here are the rules that Gainesville adheres to. The rollcage/bar requirement is spelled out:
http://www.gainesvilleraceway.com/apcm/templates/trackinfo.asp?articleid=26460&zoneid=69
Now, the "Straman" CRX got prior approval, with the caveat that Team Gutty essentially said it was a POS with no chance of winning. They just wanted to have fun. I suggested that they were shooting for a "Straman CRX" visual theme.
We'd like to keep the competitors from ditching body panels to save weight. The cars need to look good...and a CRX without fenders would look like ass. A weird VW bug contraption, OTOH, would not.
Duke of U. Can you document that the trade was indeed 'real' with an email or something? We tend to allow these trades to happen as long as it's 'reasonable'
Per
Crap... if i reach my goals at all... have to figure out a way to get a rollbar into budget. Thankfully I can avoid adding harnesses into the budget.
rules state: 10. A roll bar is mandatory in: a. Any full-bodied car running 11.00-11.49 (7.00-7.35) b.Convertibles running 11.00 – 13.49 (7.00-8.25) 11. Roll Cage mandatory 10.99 (1/8th 6.99) or quicker; certified chassis 9.99 (1/8th 6.39) and quicker 12. A quick release, 3” Driver restraint system, with a 2 inch crotch strap, meeting SFI spec 16.1 is mandatory if a roll bar or roll cage is required
Possibly a driveshaft loop also. Feels odd on a Miata.
rules state: 23. Drive shaft loop required 13.99 1/4 Mile; (1/8 Mile 8.59) or quicker, or if running slicks, 11.49 1/4 Mile or 7.35 1/8 Mile with street tires
Off to crunch numbers and estimates again... sigh.
Could a basic 4-point roll bar be allowed "free" as a safety item to allow convertibles to legally run competitive times with hardtops? Just a simple 4-point, maybe must be bolt in or some such to reduce schenanigans with people trying to stiffen their chassis for performance. Other than being legal to run the times I don't see what performance advantage a 4-point bar would have, and you could say any Weld in or 4+ point bar does count for budget.
I
I'll discuss that with David etal. It might be something along the lines of "commercially available bolt-in roll bars and cages" added to the free safety equipment clause.
nocones wrote: Could a basic 4-point roll bar be allowed "free" as a safety item to allow convertibles to legally run competitive times with hardtops? Just a simple 4-point, maybe must be bolt in or some such to reduce schenanigans with people trying to stiffen their chassis for performance. Other than being legal to run the times I don't see what performance advantage a 4-point bar would have, and you could say any Weld in or 4+ point bar does count for budget. I
I'm not sure a basic 4-point would qualify, per NHRA rules. I found this with a quick Google search:
When do I need a roll bar or roll cage, and what should it look like?
A roll bar is required in any convertible running 13.49 seconds or quicker in the quarter mile, and in other cars beginning at 11.49. The roll bar is accepted in vehicles running as quick as 10.00 second e.t., provided the stock firewall and floorboard is intact, other than for installation of wheel tubs. The rollbar must be constructed of minimum 1 ¾ inch o.d. x .118 inch wall mild steel tubing, or 1 ¾ x .083 chrome moly tubing, and must conform to the following diagram:
Per Schroeder wrote: I'll discuss that with David etal. It might be something along the lines of "commercially available bolt-in roll bars and cages" added to the free safety equipment clause.
Something like this would be nice for folks who want to run the car in Lemons too, except the "commercially available" part kinda excludes things like Wartburgs :(
1/2 our GRM budget has to go into the cage just to make it to Lemons. We may sawzall it out after lemons just to get some GRM budget back, we'll see where the budget ends up.
Per Schroeder wrote: I'd rather see road-racing style cages rather than the drag cages, personally.
I couldn't agree more. I think most Challenge competitors would be found out auto-x'ing or participating in track events, as opposed to drag racing. Add in the aforementioned Lemons participation and it would be great to be able to have a dual event car. I know roll cages/bars have been argued back and forth for some time, but I think any chassis stiffening gained from a roll cage is offset by the weight gain.
Per Schroeder wrote: I'd rather see road-racing style cages rather than the drag cages, personally.
Ive got no problem with that, again, works well with those trying to double up the 2 events.
This is a good example of 'rules creep' as it could quickly evolve to cages that tie the front and rear suspensions together. In my mind, I'd like to see Kirk, Hard Dog or Autopower bolt-in cages being legal under safety allowances.
I kinda like the SCCA Stock class roll bar and cage allowances. Simply put, must be bolt in and can't tie anything together. Does anyone run one? Nope, because they make the car slower on the autocross course. But...they would be safer for the top end of the strip.
Per
You'll need to log in to post.