Driven5 wrote:
Ironically amusing how all the antagonizing and whining carrying over from the 'Aston' debate is only coming from one side anymore...It probably just takes too much maturity to simply accept differing opinions, I guess.
You'd be wrong.... because I didn't give a E36 M3 in the previous debate and I don't give a E36 M3 now. I just found it funny. Maybe you should look into a sense of humor.
yamaha
PowerDork
12/3/13 2:36 p.m.
In reply to Bobzilla:
Precisely. I like it, and pending the prices on these, I might cross shop it with a fiesta st at some point this year.
In reply to Bobzilla:
I just checked my sense of humor, and it is fully functional. The lack of humor appears to be coming from the keystroke input generator on your end.
slefain
UltraDork
12/3/13 2:41 p.m.
And here I am waiting til midnight on Thursday to get my official press release from Ford to post on my site. I guess the embargoes are going to start falling now.
I like it. It's a nice evolutionary look from previous cars. Glad they didn't try to go retro with a Mustang II look....
I like it. I can't read the article, how physically big is it? I know it's lighter, but is it smaller?
I like it... a lot! Can't wait to see the final product driving around. Nice job Ford.
bravenrace wrote:
It doesn't have an EVO profile, and I happen to like the rear better than the last mustang.
I agree with you, the latest mustang has the three tailights but with a goofy upturned angle (for no reason) which looks dumb.
I really like it. Mind you its loaded to the gills so the interior is a bit busy so most will be easier on the eyes and the lower rear valance needs to be all black.
I was really hoping for something a little more out there, the high stills will make it a no go for me because of my height.
Also it looks like a 4x4 in that side picture.
Channel or section that thing about two or three inches and you would have a nice looking GT. I'll wait to see it in the flesh and sit in it before I commit or condemn it though. If it won't drive comfortably with my arm on the window sill it won't end up in my garage, as much as I was hoping a lighter, smaller Mustang might be my belated retirement gift to myself.
interior is downright ugly
wearymicrobe wrote:
I really like it. Mind you its loaded to the gills so the interior is a bit busy so most will be easier on the eyes and the lower rear valance needs to be all black.
I was really hoping for something a little more out there, the high stills will make it a no go for me because of my height.
Also it looks like a 4x4 in that side picture.
I'm only 5'7" and could see out of my '13 just fine.
Feverishly waiting for the overlay picture. Since they say that the wheelbase is the same, we just need a good profile shot and someone better with computers than I to make one of them translucent and combine the images. Come on internet!
z31maniac wrote:
wearymicrobe wrote:
I really like it. Mind you its loaded to the gills so the interior is a bit busy so most will be easier on the eyes and the lower rear valance needs to be all black.
I was really hoping for something a little more out there, the high stills will make it a no go for me because of my height.
Also it looks like a 4x4 in that side picture.
I'm only 5'7" and could see out of my '13 just fine.
Over six foot so no mustang for me at least with a helmet on.
Anybody seen an Aston lately ?
Ian F
UltimaDork
12/3/13 5:18 p.m.
I like it. Enough that I may actually buy one in a couple of years.
The side view looks makes it look like the 86 twins fatter older sister.
Will
Dork
12/3/13 5:28 p.m.
I like the rear view a lot, but that red diffuser is begging for the Krylon touch. I'm not sold on the rest of it. These front impact regulations make the noses of all the new cars seem awfully high.
When is the official reveal supposed to be?
I figure that's the next time I should pay attention, since a bunch of the technical questions should get answered...
Will wrote:
These front impact regulations make the noses of all the new cars seem awfully high.
I agree, but how do they away with a low front on cars like the Corvette?
bravenrace wrote:
Will wrote:
These front impact regulations make the noses of all the new cars seem awfully high.
I agree, but how do they away with a low front on cars like the Corvette?
It's about the distance between the hood and the engine if I remember correctly. Pushrod engines are (or can be) short.
I'm betting the next one won't have windows. You'll just sit in darkness and drive with a little LCD in front of you.
Awesome looking Hyundai....