Ehh - hood scoops, while to the intent of this thread, are not really what I would consider significant asymmetry. At that point one could argue that even a badge that is not on the vehicle centerline would qualify.
Trivia time. 1.8 DSMs had flat hoods. You can't put a flat hood on a 2.0 1G DSM without lowering the motor slightly or the cam cover will rub on the hood. All 2G DSMs had a hood bulge, even though only the turbo cars needed it. The NT 2Gs used a Chrysler motor that was completely reversed with the timing belt on the passenger side. So it had a trans bump. Which if you take out of context, sounds dirty.
In reply to Jumper K Balls :
Not just the Pacer but also the Ford Windstar, for a short time, had a driver's door that was longer than the front passenger door to compensate for the lack of a sliding door behind the driver's door.
I believe that the Pacer had a longer passenger side door.
The cube or whatever the hell its called drives me nuts. Same with offset scoops, but not bulges like a dohc neon.
Im SLIGHTLY cdo.
Mazdax605 said:How about the Hyundai Veloster with two doors on one side, and only one door on the other?
You misspelled "Saturn SC".
In reply to Mazdax605 :
I was going to say that, but since you didn't post a picture, here is my old whip.
pinchvalve said:Spare tires are often asymmetrical
yes, but Land Rover's actually build their rear doors to accommodate the spare. The Discovery has a long history of asymmetrical rear doors.
As for cars.. I always fancied the side scoop from the 1st gen MR2
I remember reading that AMC Pacers had a longer door one one side? Not sure if that’s true ... or why they would have done so.
EDIT: I should read more carefully. Already been mentioned in the thread!
If hood bulges and NACA ducts count, there are probably a lot more asymmetrical cars out there. All Lancer Evoultions prior to the VIII had NACA ducts on one side. And the Triumph TR4/TR5/TR250 had bulges on the right side.
You'll need to log in to post.