snailmont5oh said:
Sometimes, a knockoff is something that another company copied and manufactured from existing parts or stolen drawings. Other times, as noted above, a knockoff is made by simply over-producing an item that one was contracted to build. It may have started with organized crime in Italy, but the Far-East manufacturers do this as a normal operating practice. I know that companies do what they can to maximize profits, but if you send your manufacturing offshore because of the allure of cheap labor, you asked for it. Especially if you didn't lower your price to reflect the savings, which you didn't do. Pretty much every product that shifted their manufacturing to China has felt the sting of this, from Vise Grip to Sharpie to Brembo. Is it wrong? Sure. But, if corporate leadership cared for the long-term health of the economy they operate in more than a short-term blip in profits or stock price, this wouldn't be an issue, because American manufacturing would still be done in America. Not to be all "soapbox" about this, but if the farmers in this country managed their land like the investment firms and others in control of the money in this country run the economy, they would be without a livelihood in six years, and the country would starve.
[/rant]
This is correct, and it's not limited to ebay-type stuff. For instance, MAN B&W produces big diesel engines for supertankers and other big ships. Because China is a major producer of big ships that use these engines, MAN licenses companies in China to build and/or assemble their engines. These companies build X number of the licensed MAN engines for the market that buys them, but then they (or a related company) also build an exact copy (probably using all the same specs and materials) of that engine and sells it as a "Changxi" diesel or something, at a lower price. The lower price isn't because the engine is necessarily any different, but only because they don't have to pay the MAN licensing fees. Most of these "Changxi" engines go to domestic shippers buying cheaper ships overall who don't want to pay for MAN engines. So as noted above, a lot of this "knockoff" stuff is actually made in the same factory as the "real" stuff to the same specs (though a lot of it isn't). And obviously the Germans know this is happening, yet MAN still continues to sign new licensing contracts - because the money they make using cheap Chinese labor still offsets any competition losses they might experience from the Chinese-badged copied diesels. Most of this stuff is known, and companies just consider it the "cost of doing business" in any cheap labor market with lax patent/trademark enforcement.
Same goes for all kinds of other products. The radiator in my e30 rally car is from China and is an exact copy of a Mishimoto radiator (minus the Mishimoto stamp) made in the "Koyostar" factory (which actually makes a lot of OEM components for major car companies as well). I've matched them up side by side and seen cutaways and the Koyostar is every bit as good as the Mishimoto from what I can tell (and has worked flawlessly for 9 years in a stage rally car). The only difference I could find was the Koyostar rad uses a cheap-feeling drain plug vs. the nicer one on the Mishimoto. I read some business report years ago that stated the factory actually made REAL Mishimotos as well (which Mishimoto then sold as "made in Japan"). IDK the veracity of that, but companies definitely do that. Oh, and the Koyostar was 1/3rd the price of the Mishimoto.
Then again, just to play devil's advocate - every country does this. If you think that nothing made in the USA or Germany or Japan is a copy of something originally made someplace else, you're fooling yourself. And there are plenty of reputable aftermarket car companies out there that sell parts that are almost exact copies of parts their competitors make, just with different paint colors or brand etching. I remember about 15 years ago some Nissan afficianados figured out at least 2-3 parts STILLEN (Steve Millen's company) was selling for Nissans that were definitely copies of products by smaller companies who had them on the market previously. Those smaller companies may not have had patents on them, so it was probably technically legal, but still just as much of a "knockoff." I'll have to find the old forum discussions that talked about it. The guys who did the engineering comparisons used some nifty methods to make their determinations.