1 2 3
Fueled by Caffeine
Fueled by Caffeine MegaDork
2/24/16 1:10 p.m.

http://www.torquenews.com/1084/subaru-ranks-2-america-best-made-car-brand-who-s-1

My head hurts reading this? Subaru and Audi are the best overall car brands....

Head gaskets, timing chain tensioners.. VAG! WTF? Is GRM wrong?

MCarp22
MCarp22 Dork
2/24/16 1:17 p.m.
Fueled by Caffeine wrote: Is GRM wrong?

No. But GRM tends to prefer stuff 15 years old. So if you want to know about headgasket issues on an '01 Legacy, ask here.

JohnRW1621
JohnRW1621 MegaDork
2/24/16 1:27 p.m.

Subaru is number one but currently, I think they really make two cars and then just multiple configurations of those two.

Brett_Murphy
Brett_Murphy GRM+ Memberand PowerDork
2/24/16 1:56 p.m.

100% of all Mazda's cars are recommended, too.

jstein77
jstein77 UltraDork
2/24/16 2:16 p.m.
Brett_Murphy wrote: 100% of all Mazda's cars are recommended, too.

And rightfully so; there's a place where GRM and CR agree.

Robbie
Robbie SuperDork
2/24/16 2:29 p.m.

But how much does it cost to get a perfect rating from CR?

NickD
NickD HalfDork
2/24/16 2:47 p.m.

I don't get all the Subaru hate. All the ones I've owned or have worked on have never given me a bit of trouble. These is the only place on the internet where I hear such hatred of them

Javelin
Javelin GRM+ Memberand MegaDork
2/24/16 3:06 p.m.
NickD wrote: I don't get all the Subaru hate. All the ones I've owned or have worked on have never given me a bit of trouble. These is the only place on the internet where I hear such hatred of them

I sell car parts for a living, and Subaru head gasket sets sell more than everything else combined up here in the Pacific Northwest.

NickD
NickD HalfDork
2/24/16 3:18 p.m.
Javelin wrote:
NickD wrote: I don't get all the Subaru hate. All the ones I've owned or have worked on have never given me a bit of trouble. These is the only place on the internet where I hear such hatred of them
I sell car parts for a living, and Subaru head gasket sets sell more than everything else *combined* up here in the Pacific Northwest.

Never had to put a set in. But even so, considering the fact that engines practically fall out of these after removing 2 bolts, wouldn't be that concerned. Worked on way worse engines (Ecotec 2.4L and 3.6Ls, for examples) Every other car around here in Central New York is a Subaru and everyone loves them.

Kreb
Kreb GRM+ Memberand UltraDork
2/24/16 3:37 p.m.

My impression (as opposed to an expert opinion) is that lots of head gaskets get replaced because people don't want oil stains on their driveways (or their in-laws, or their clients, et cetera). Subaru gurus: How often do the gaskets have to be replaced because of actual lost compression, bulk fluid loss, or other significant mechanical issue, as opposed to the staining problem?

And I'm not defending Subaru, just wondering. My best friend has 225k on his Subbie and it runs great - but it's leaked oil for the last five years.

Brett_Murphy
Brett_Murphy GRM+ Memberand PowerDork
2/24/16 3:53 p.m.

I have almost 100k miles on my 2004 Forester XT, and the passenger valve cover was leaking. The head gaskets are still doing fine. The 2003 WRX has 227k miles, and is not leaking. Both of mine are turbos, though, and apparently they have fewer problems.

Knurled
Knurled GRM+ Memberand MegaDork
2/24/16 4:28 p.m.
JohnRW1621 wrote: Subaru is number one but currently, I think they really make two cars and then just multiple configurations of those two.

That is kind of what Subaru has always done.

I like what of my friends says about RX-8s. He says that you only have problems if you join an online forum.

iceracer
iceracer PowerDork
2/24/16 5:20 p.m.

Is there some confusion between head gaskets and valve cover gaskets ?

Keith Tanner
Keith Tanner GRM+ Memberand MegaDork
2/24/16 5:26 p.m.

My friend bought a 97 Legacy GT new. At just over 60k (when the warranty expired), the engine did too. Some sort of internal oiling problem. The car had been serviced at the Subaru dealer, so after going up the ladder he got the engine replaced for the price of labor.

The replacement engine was pretty much DOA. Again, oiling problems. The third engine was fine.

My parents had a 97 Legacy GT. When they got it, it was on the second engine at about 60,000 miles. It was trouble-free. They sold it to that same friend of mine, who then had the head gasket fail on him gradually. Loss of compression. He's not an abusive driver, he just happened to be driving the car when the music stopped.

So, that's two Subarus. Between them, three dead engines and a head gasket job. None were particularly high mileage, the highest may have been 120k.

The current Subaru that my parents bought is having weird problems, and just got a new ECU after a bunch of emissions parts had to be replaced. That friend is also driving a Forester these days, and is finding parts are priced like premium cars but it's not one. His other cars are a Z4 (100% reliable), an Element and a 25-year-old Miata. He wishes the Subaru was as reliable as the BMW.

Both are looking to replace their Subarus, and neither is looking for a Subaru to be that replacement.

Stefan (Not Bruce)
Stefan (Not Bruce) GRM+ Memberand MegaDork
2/24/16 6:06 p.m.

In reply to iceracer:

headgaskets also seal oil passages and on a boxer engine, I suspect the leaks there could be more prevalent.

Javelin
Javelin GRM+ Memberand MegaDork
2/24/16 6:53 p.m.

On the Subarus, it's an 04-ish to 12-ish issue mostly, and it's loss of compression and/or coolant. They all weep oil. Seriously, I sold 3 more sets today. This is not internet hyperbole.

BrokenYugo
BrokenYugo UltimaDork
2/24/16 6:54 p.m.

In reply to Kreb:

I've got a friend with one that goes through enough oil he probably could have paid somebody to put gaskets in it at this point.

Harvey
Harvey GRM+ Memberand Dork
2/24/16 7:03 p.m.

Multiple friends had their STIs grenade engines without any real reason behind it other than STI motors suck balls.

SnowMongoose
SnowMongoose Dork
2/24/16 7:08 p.m.

In reply to Javelin:

I'm a couple hours north of Jav, can confirm that Subaru guys spend money primarily on head gaskets and plastidip.

Fueled by Caffeine
Fueled by Caffeine MegaDork
2/24/16 7:40 p.m.

In reply to SnowMongoose:

Monster energy stickers. You forgot monster energy stickers.

NGTD
NGTD UltraDork
2/24/16 7:46 p.m.

We should just start a list of cars this board hates:

  1. Subaru - I have owned 5 and my mom has one.
  2. VW/Audi - my wife and I have owned 6 and still have 2.
  3. (Fill in the blanks).
mazdeuce
mazdeuce PowerDork
2/24/16 7:56 p.m.

Some of the bias is because of experience with 5-15 year old cars instead of 0-5 year old cars like most of CR surveys.
I have four friends with BRZ's, one lost a motor at 21k, another a cam gear at 86k, the other two are fine. Two of three friends with STi's had motors fail, one at 18k, the other a bit over 40. I do know a lot of happy Subaru owners as well, but I don't personally know any other brand of enthusiast cars with that kind of failure rate.
My dislike of Audi/VW comes from a 2000 TT and and 1999 Beetle. Both simultaneously wonderful and horrible.

Knurled
Knurled GRM+ Memberand MegaDork
2/24/16 9:57 p.m.
NGTD wrote: We should just start a list of cars this board hates: 1. Subaru - I have owned 5 and my mom has one. 2. VW/Audi - my wife and I have owned 6 and still have 2. 3. (Fill in the blanks).

I have had two Subarus personally, and have bought two more for my mom.

I currently own three VWs and I've had VW before these. Two of my VWs are longitudinal ones, which seems to be the bottom of the VW pecking order (because VW people are bass ackward and the longitudinal ones are the best ones only they are too busy hitting fents and crubs to understand)

Subaru engines die because people fail to put oil in them. Or in my case, they drive to work at WOT with no coolant in the engine because late for work, blown radiator not holding water, and ran out of giving a crap that day. (May be a very small subset of Subaru engine failure)

And then there are people like Miles who had almost 300k on his when he sold it. Or the guy with the world's rattiest Legacy who we keep telling to get a new car, whose car has a rusted through fuel tank on the top right so he can't put more thanlike 3 gallons in at a time or the jet pump will fill the right side of the tank to the gushing point. I think it is something like 350k, and the car looks far worse than most vehicles that have 350k on them...

NGTD
NGTD UltraDork
2/24/16 11:37 p.m.

In reply to Knurled:

As much as I bitch about my 99 Passat, it was without a doubt the nicest car to drive I have owned.

DrBoost
DrBoost UltimaDork
2/25/16 6:32 a.m.

I'm glad GRM and CR don't agree. CR is the most out-of-touch publication when it comes to cars, unless Cigar Montly does a drive report.
Years ago they were reviewing the Wrangler and lambasted it because of the poor fuel economy, bumpy ride, wind noise, and cramped interior. Hey moron! It's a Wrangler. It's SUPPOSED to have all those things. They didn't mention the fact that the 4.0L I6 (this was back in the early TJ years) goes for 300,000 miles without even trying, and that they go where only billy-goats dare. When they complained about the road noise it blew my mind. Look around you, there's nothing but canvas above your hip except the windshield.
Morons.
I wonder if they would complain about the fuel economy or harsh ride from a Lamborghini?

1 2 3

You'll need to log in to post.

Our Preferred Partners
P59qFQoktOX0cy7on5SwOXqSU75Ggc8du4COEnmxh4lLqnAD6N33A4ofKu5BWmKR