1 2
pinchvalve
pinchvalve SuperDork
9/7/11 1:44 p.m.

Kinda reminds me of the i-Mark Turbo RS:

Back then, we never got the best models either, but at least we got some!

ultraclyde
ultraclyde HalfDork
9/7/11 2:39 p.m.

That I-Mark is the car I learned to drive stick in at 15. Well, not THAT one, but you know....

Seats by recaro, tuned by Lotus, factory boost guage....ahh the memories.

aussiesmg
aussiesmg SuperDork
9/7/11 3:46 p.m.
92CelicaHalfTrac wrote:
dculberson wrote:
Taiden wrote: Stock it has been tested to run a 13.5 second quarter mile. With a manual boost controller and an adjustable fpr and a chip (used to be cheap money) the essentials are good for an extra 40% horsepower or so. If I recall correctly the 2001 C5 runs a 13.3 stock.
So stock for stock, the C5 is faster. Modified, well, what's the point of the comparison?
This is the Grassroots forum, which ends up being cheaper and faster?

Then you can add in AWD for offroad use, launches etc, sleeper looks, rarity, oddball ownership and much more in the GRM world

Tom Heath
Tom Heath Web Manager
9/7/11 3:53 p.m.

Which do you like more? That's the answer in my book. Who gives a running fig what's faster as long as you're having fun with what you drive?

orphancars
orphancars Reader
9/7/11 4:52 p.m.

^ +1 to Tom ^

dculberson
dculberson HalfDork
9/8/11 4:16 p.m.

I have to agree with that!

1 2

You'll need to log in to post.

Our Preferred Partners
pizU9ntKV3GsXoGQFYfwkdaixK7O8NbIHpHXntW4gA5TTpTrByAnm8IylqZN2z6q