Looks like this once looked pretty cool, and could once again with some work. Very interesting. I'm also posting this on the classic side where it likely belongs but who knows.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1973-AUDI-COUPE-S_W0QQitemZ130309236654QQcmdZViewItemQQptZUS_Cars_Trucks?hash=item1e570927ae&_trksid=p4506.c0.m245&_trkparms=65%3A7%7C39%3A1%7C240%3A1318
pretty car, but parts would be $
so if I read it correctly this is not even a US model...
RUN AWAY! RUN AWAY!
btw if you like monty python check out this link
I used to have a 1970 100LS sedan and I LOVED it. Parts very $ and it rusted out in Wisconsin, but it was very roomy and fun to drive. If you could replace the original engine with something more up to date and powerful then rustproof the crap out of it, that might make a nice car.
The potential disaster that awaits the poor buyer is nearly matched by the seller's mastery of the English language...
I wonder if a quattro drivetrain would fit in there with a little work???
"what fits where is directly related to force applied"
dont ever forget it... :P
-J0N
Yea, that is a parts car... There is a point where unless you are rich enough to just have stuff made from scratch (or make it yourself) if you need it that a car isnt realisticly repairable.
I have a '96 copy of the Classic Sports Car (magazine) Collector Car Guide. Back then, our "friends" in the UK called this the "only truely collectable model of the Audi 100". They also mentioned the fact that parts would be problematic, as it shares (or DOESN'T share) almost ZERO parts with the 100 sedan models.
As a former Audi owner, I am both tempted to bid, and AFRAID to bid, on such a rare model of a fairly good car..
RossD
Reader
6/1/09 8:50 p.m.
twin turbo 2.7L V6 + 944 turbo transaxle = audi sex