1 2
dj06482
dj06482 GRM+ Memberand New Reader
9/2/08 9:10 a.m.
P71 wrote: kreb, The T-5 is actually a very weak. Even the Mustang 4.6's have Tremec's since the mid-90's (3550 or 3650 or something like that). 300 FtLbs is about the highest TQ a stock T-5 can handle. The T-56 is stronger and also has a huge overdrive in 6th (.5 to 1 as mentioned) which nets great fuel economy.

I would say the quote that the T5 is weak is a generalization, which I'll get to below. In V8 Mustangs, the T-5 was replaced by the T-45 in 1996 (with the swap to the modular engine). The T-45 was replaced with the T-3650 during the 2002 model run.

The Miata is a completely different application than a Mustang, so a T5 might be sufficient, depending on your power levels, along with what you'll be doing with the car. Some T5s seem to hold up well to abuse (high RPM launches on slicks, power shifting, etc.) whereas others break under the same conditions. The T56s are heavier than the T5s, are physically larger, and most claim they don't shift as smoothly as a T5 (I happen to agree). T5s can be upgraded for better durability, many outfits offer upgraded gear sets, etc. (G-Force, Astro Performance, etc.)

Most T5 issues in Mustangs seem to stem from drag racing, which may not be your primary activity in the Miata. Even so, launching at a high RPM on slicks in a 3200-3600 lb car is far different than auto-xing/road racing/daily driving a Miata.

DJ

Keith
Keith GRM+ Memberand SuperDork
9/2/08 10:17 a.m.

The first turn-key car that we're doing for a customer will have an LS3 in it, so I think it's fair to say we'll need some gearbox strength :) The sort of people that stuff V8s in Miatas are the sort of people who will bolt on a set of drag slicks and take it to the track.

I picked up the latest copies of Hot Rod and Car Craft. There's some good info in there, and I've subscribed to both so I can learn me a whole bunch. Thanks for the help so far, keep it coming!

oldopelguy
oldopelguy HalfDork
9/2/08 5:47 p.m.

I sort of like the 4.8L myself. With the shorter 327-esque stroke and a Corvette/Camaro flywheel instead of the truck one (@9# lighter) it should rev quicker all other things being equal, and it's still rated at 280+hp. Given it's significantly lower buy-in as well it seems to me to be a good option for engine swaps in lightweight cars. I'd really like to drop that crank in an aluminum 5.7L block for a de-stroker and see how it runs, but that project can wait.

1 2

You'll need to log in to post.

Our Preferred Partners
1lImd5ccHzA6SZlBmx81BTHXnMMF7pOIszxNgLJ6qpc1kT8iMXbcfkXeyckzQ5zr