One more example of how box flares make everything awesomer:

Found more of the Mangusta... I'm loving that race trimmed one. http://www.flickr.com/photos/cjcam/sets/72157623600587943/

stuart in mn wrote: It must be just about the only Mangusta that was ever actually raced.

As Yoda said, "There is another."

From the 2008 Big Bend Open Road Race

I yearn for a Lotus Carlton.

I would love to see more classic American muscle wide body cars. So hard to find good ones.

blaze86vic wrote: <img

This one looks bent in the middle. I know it's just the angle and the non-flared front door but it just looks bent.

The volvo wagon doesn't do it for me. I think the car is too boxy to make box flares look good.

In reply to MrBenjamonkey:

Mr. Monkey, I do believe you've just corrupted this entire thread...

But it's got a turbo!

its hilarious

MrBenjamonkey wrote:

My daughter is going to try for her drivers license today....that might be a car to put on the list....if it were automatic.

MrBenjamonkey wrote:

This is the perfect car for kids with learners permits. Especially if they live it a larger metro area.

Redemption

Close enough.

oldsaw wrote:

Now that's just wrong.....

Does this count? It's only flared in the back though:

This shows up at work sometimes. I don't know if the owner realizes what it is. It's one of two that I've ever seen with my own eyes. If you don't get it, take a closer look at that windshield. It's no regular 911.

Its a speedster...I never understood the appeal.

Less weight, slightly lower center of gravity and a lot more money. What's not to like?

Hasbro wrote:

Same car:

With a link to the build-up:

http://grassrootsmotorsports.com/forum/grm/momis-x19/2581/page1/

BoxheadTim wrote: Less weight, slightly lower center of gravity and a lot more money. What's not to like?

Let's see, less structural rigidity, worse aerodynamics, and lousy headroom. Sounds great to me. it does look cool though